2007 18th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility 2007
DOI: 10.1109/emczur.2007.4388215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of source - phantom multiple interactions on the field transmitted in a flat phantom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system presented in [14] uses a multi-probe technology combined with switching networks for spherical near-field measurements in the 18-50 GHz range to retrieve the incident power density. When an antenna is placed in the vicinity of a lossy medium, such as human skin, electromagnetic contrast at the air/skin interface results in the appearance of scattered field and near field interactions, which modify the field impinging the human body compared to the free-space radiation [15,16]. Hence, in free-space measurements of the incident power density, variations of the power density due to the coupling of a wireless device with the human body are not taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system presented in [14] uses a multi-probe technology combined with switching networks for spherical near-field measurements in the 18-50 GHz range to retrieve the incident power density. When an antenna is placed in the vicinity of a lossy medium, such as human skin, electromagnetic contrast at the air/skin interface results in the appearance of scattered field and near field interactions, which modify the field impinging the human body compared to the free-space radiation [15,16]. Hence, in free-space measurements of the incident power density, variations of the power density due to the coupling of a wireless device with the human body are not taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] The problem of extracting the maximum amount of information on an electromagnetic field over a domain D O from field measurements on a domain D I , with a priori information on the source [Bertero et al, 1979;Marks, 1980;Severcan, 1982;Yaghjian, 1986;Kao et al, 1999;Schreier et al, 2000;Piestun and Miller, 2000;Derat et al, 2007;Vinetti, 2008;Gruber and Marengo, 2008;Capozzoli et al, 2009a] (equivalent current distribution [Collin, 1991] or polarization current, contrast source [Langenberg, 2002;Li et al, 2009]), henceforth referred to as the source J , sustaining the radiated (scattered) field of interest, is relevant in a large number of applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] In microwave and millimeter-wave applications, we mention Near-Field/Far-Field (NFFF) [Yaghjian, 1986;Capozzoli et al, 2009a] or Very Near-Field/ Far-Field (V-NFFF) [Vinetti, 2008] transformations, in which D I is located within the near-field or very nearfield of the radiator to be characterized, while D O is located in its far-field region and a priori information on the radiator/scatterer geometry is exploited. We also point out applications of electromagnetic compatibility in which D I and D O can be disjoint domains located in the near-field region of unintentional sources [Derat et al, 2007]. Finally, we cite Multiple Input Multiple Output systems (MIMO) for which, from receivers located in D O , it is desired to reconstruct the information transmitted by sources in D I [Piestun and Miller, 2000;Gruber and Marengo, 2008].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of jewellery complicates the scenario but is fundamentally different from two independent sources. The authors have also examined the mechanisms of near-field interaction between dipoles and mobile phone models and homogeneous body models [5] [6]. Studies have been conducted in the past on exposure to multiple mobile phone sources inside enclosed spaces such as trains and elevators [7] [8] but studies on multiple radiation sources from a single device are limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%