2001
DOI: 10.1093/ps/80.8.1171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Source and Percentage of Fat Added to Diet on Performance and Fatty Acid Composition of Egg Yolks of Two Strains of Laying Hens

Abstract: We conducted a trial to study the influence of strain of hen (white vs. brown) and source and percentage of added fat to diet on productive performance and fatty acid (FA) profile of the egg yolk. There were nine dietary treatments: a control diet without added fat and eight diets arranged as a 2 x 4 factorial (5 vs. 10% added tallow, olive, soy, or linseed oil). Each treatment was replicated five times, and the trial lasted 12 wk. White hens produced yolks with more saturated FA (P < 0.001) and less monounsat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

24
148
5
16

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
24
148
5
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Probably, the low LNA intake was limiting egg mass production in hens fed the low energy diet, penalizing feed efficiency. In contrast, in the current research LNA intake was 2.94 and 2.15 g/d for the high and low energy diets, respectively, values that were above requirements for both groups of hens (Grobas et al, 2001;Bouvarel et al, 2010). Also, in the research of Pérez-Bonilla et al (2012a), in which egg production increased with increases in the energy content of the diet, an increase in energy concentration of 7.5% (11.10-11.94 MJ AME n /kg) decreased Table 5.…”
Section: Laying Phase Dietscontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Probably, the low LNA intake was limiting egg mass production in hens fed the low energy diet, penalizing feed efficiency. In contrast, in the current research LNA intake was 2.94 and 2.15 g/d for the high and low energy diets, respectively, values that were above requirements for both groups of hens (Grobas et al, 2001;Bouvarel et al, 2010). Also, in the research of Pérez-Bonilla et al (2012a), in which egg production increased with increases in the energy content of the diet, an increase in energy concentration of 7.5% (11.10-11.94 MJ AME n /kg) decreased Table 5.…”
Section: Laying Phase Dietscontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…From 17-46 wk of age, hens fed the high energy diet consumed 3.7% less feed and had 3.1% better FCR than hens fed the low energy diet but egg production was not affected, consistent with data of Grobas et al (2001) and Safaa et al (2009). The decrease in ADFI observed in hens fed the high energy diet was expected because poultry eat to satisfy their energy requirements, provided that the capacity of the GIT is not compromised (Hill et al, 1956;Leeson et al, 1997).…”
Section: Laying Phase Dietssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Similar results were documented by Cachaldora et al (2008) who revealed that yolk color increased in the diets supplemented with n-3 oils with respect to the control diets. Also, Grobas et al (2001) noted that yolk color benefited from n-3 oils. The oxycarotenoids contained in the diet are lipid soluble, and therefore their absorption from the intestine are likely to be improved when fed in parallel with the lipids (Grobas et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Grobas et al (2001) noted that yolk color benefited from n-3 oils. The oxycarotenoids contained in the diet are lipid soluble, and therefore their absorption from the intestine are likely to be improved when fed in parallel with the lipids (Grobas et al, 2001). Virtually, commercial table eggs contain a high proportion of n-6 PUFA but are a poor source of n-3 PUFA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eggs were individually weighed and the external and internal quality was determined. The shell was separated from the yolk and albumen weighed after drying overnight at 60℃ as indicated by Grobas, Mendez, Lazaro, De Blas, and Mateo (2001). Shell thickness was measured using a digital micrometer (Echometer 1061, Robotmation Company, Tokyo, Japan).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%