1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19990718)73:3<377::aid-app9>3.0.co;2-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of solvent and filler on some physical properties of a fluoroelastomer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was discovered that all samples exhibited almost no resilience at −45°C, and their cold‐resistance coefficients at −42.5°C were no more than 0.1, which can be inferred that the polymer chains of fluoroether vulcanizate samples were already at the glass state. Under −40°C, the cold‐resistance coefficients of samples were close to 0.3, which was in line with the expectation, illustrating that CB filling may not significantly influence T g of the fluoroether vulcanizate, for T g is mainly dependent on the properties of the FKM polymer matrix itself 54 . At −37.5°C, samples with CB content of 15 phr and below possessed slightly lower cold‐resistance coefficients than the other samples, which was more obvious at −35°C.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was discovered that all samples exhibited almost no resilience at −45°C, and their cold‐resistance coefficients at −42.5°C were no more than 0.1, which can be inferred that the polymer chains of fluoroether vulcanizate samples were already at the glass state. Under −40°C, the cold‐resistance coefficients of samples were close to 0.3, which was in line with the expectation, illustrating that CB filling may not significantly influence T g of the fluoroether vulcanizate, for T g is mainly dependent on the properties of the FKM polymer matrix itself 54 . At −37.5°C, samples with CB content of 15 phr and below possessed slightly lower cold‐resistance coefficients than the other samples, which was more obvious at −35°C.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Under À40 C, the cold-resistance coefficients of samples were close to 0.3, which was in line with the expectation, illustrating that CB filling may not significantly influence T g of the fluoroether vulcanizate, for T g is mainly dependent on the properties of the FKM polymer matrix itself. 54 At À37.5 C, samples with CB content of 15 phr and below possessed slightly lower cold-resistance coefficients than the other samples, which was more obvious at À35 C. The reason was presumed to be the volume effect of CB filling and the separation of the ordered regions in the molecular chain by the continuous CB-elastomer phase or excessive CB agglomerates, mildly increasing low-temperature resilience of the vulcanizate at temperatures 5-10 C higher than T g .…”
Section: Engineering Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Likewise, the mechanism of the post curing of fluororubber was reported by Smith and Perkins. 11 Righetti et al 12 investigated the effect of MT carbon black loading on the glass transition temperature (T g ) of a swollen crosslinked and filled fluororubber. The effect of some fillers such as ISAF, FEF, SRF, and silica on cure, mechanical, aging, and swelling properties of fluororubber and acrylic rubberfluororubber blends was investigated by Kader et al 13 However, there have been very few reports in the literature on the effect of curative and fillers on the cure characteristics and physical properties of MVQ and FKM blends.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Righetti et al. 12 investigated the effect of MT carbon black loading on the glass transition temperature ( T g ) of a swollen crosslinked and filled fluororubber. The effect of some fillers such as ISAF, FEF, SRF, and silica on cure, mechanical, aging, and swelling properties of fluororubber and acrylic rubber–fluororubber blends was investigated by Kader et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%