2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.100917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of solidification cell structure on the martensitic transformation in additively manufactured steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the specific microstructural features previously cited for the AM-H900 samples could contribute to explain these observations. It could be assumed that finer martensite laths were associated with a higher level of internal by grinding or polishing [36,37]. Therefore, surface preparation (i.e.…”
Section: Cu-rich Precipitatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All the specific microstructural features previously cited for the AM-H900 samples could contribute to explain these observations. It could be assumed that finer martensite laths were associated with a higher level of internal by grinding or polishing [36,37]. Therefore, surface preparation (i.e.…”
Section: Cu-rich Precipitatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, the austenite amount for as-built AM samples was only 12.5%, which corresponded to a mainly martensitic microstructure, which could be explained by referring to the gas used during the building, in good agreement with Murr et al work [6] who observed mostly martensitic microstructures for the built parts when the AM process was performed under Ar, independently of the powder. Furthermore, to explain the level of retained austenite in as-built AM samples, Freeman et al [36] showed that they were able to stabilise a fully austenitic microstructure in an AM 17-4PH MSS at room temperature, because as-built AM 17-4PH MSS contained small solidification cells of 0.2-2 μm that suppressed the thermally-induced martensitic transformation, whereas former austenitic grain size controlled the transformation for wrought MSS [38][39][40][41][42][43]. Finally, Yadollahi et al showed that the formation of smaller grains and interdendritic spacing, as well as the presence of strain at high-angle grain boundaries, associated with high dislocation density in AM processes should explain the level of retained austenite in as-built AM samples [12].…”
Section: Cu-rich Precipitatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, material composition and crystal structure might play roles as they influence the solidification phenomena [101]. In Ti-alloys, although high dislocation densities are reported, they did not show cellular structure [102]; however, Al alloys [40] and steels [103] showed cellular structures. Theoretical models considering all the aspects of solidification, crystal structure, residual stresses, and sample location would give more insights.…”
Section: Sub-grain Cellular Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of cellular structure affects the solid-state phase transformation. In the SLM processed precipitationhardened martensitic stainless steel (17-4PH), Freeman et al [103] showed complete suppression of thermal martensite formation. The laser PBF samples showed a hierarchical microstructure with coarse columnar grains (10-100 μm) containing sub-grain cellular structures (0.2-2 μm) with dense dislocation walls.…”
Section: Sub-grain Cellular Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation