Influence of Soil Tillage on Soil Compaction

Badalíková, Barbora

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03681-1_2

Cited by 40 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Fernández-Ugalde et al (2009) found that while the large pores significantly decreased, the smaller pores significantly increased in no-tillage compared to conventional tillage. Badalíkova (2010) expressed that higher bulk density values under no-tillage conditions increased the amount of capillary pores. Furthermore, Gozubuyuk et al (2014) indicated that the amount of micropores could increase due to the decrease in macroporosity under no-tillage conditions.…”

Section: Water Content Of Soilmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Furthermore, no-tillage practice causes low evaporation due to more surface cover (Lampurlanés and Cantero-Martínez, 2006). Additionally, higher bulk density values under no-tillage conditions increase the proportion of capillary pores supplying water to plants (Badalíkova, 2010). Hence, seeds may gain advantage from capillary rise of water in deeper layers.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The influence of different tillage practices on water content of soil and crop yield in vetch–winter wheat rotation compared to fallow–winter wheat rotation in a high altitude and cool climate

Gözübüyük

Şahin

Adiguzel

et al. 2015

Agricultural Water Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Water Content Of Soilmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The influence of different tillage practices on water content of soil and crop yield in vetch–winter wheat rotation compared to fallow–winter wheat rotation in a high altitude and cool climate

Gözübüyük

Şahin

Adiguzel

et al. 2015

Agricultural Water Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Soil C stock that is quantified from BD, C org and soil depth is often over-estimated or under-estimated because of increasing BD due to minimum tillage (Badalikova, 2010) or decreasing BD due to large organic inputs. In the four different management zones of oil palm plantations (Fig.…”

Section: Correction Of Soil Carbon Stock For Equal Mineral Soil Basismentioning

confidence: 99%

Carbon neutral? No change in mineral soil carbon stock under oil palm plantations derived from forest or non-forest in Indonesia

Khasanah

Noordwijk

Ningsih³

et al. 2015

Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A B S T R A C TSustainability criteria for palm oil production guide new planting toward non-forest land cover on mineral soil, avoiding carbon debts caused by forest and peat conversion. Effects on soil carbon stock (soil C stock ) of land use change trajectories from forest and non-forest to oil palm on mineral soils include initial decline and subsequent recovery, however modeling efforts and life-cycle accounting are constrained by lack of comprehensive data sets; only few case studies underpin current debate. We analyzed soil C stock (Mg ha À1 ), soil bulk density (BD, g cm À3 ) and soil organic carbon concentration (C org , %) from 155 plots in 20 oil palm plantations across the major production areas of Indonesia, identifying trends during a production cycle on 6 plantations with sufficient spread in plot age. Plots were sampled in four management zones: weeded circle (WC), interrow (IR), frond stacks (FS), and harvest paths (HP); three depth intervals 0-5, 5-15 and 15-30 cm were sampled in each zone. Compared to the initial condition, increases in C org (16.2%) and reduction in BD (8.9%) in the FS zone, was compensated by decrease in C org (21.4%) and increase in BD (6.6%) in the HP zone, with intermediate results elsewhere. For a weighted average of the four management zones and after correction for equal mineral soil basis, the net temporal trend in soil C stock in the top 30 cm of soil across all data was not significantly different from zero in both forest-and non-forest-derived oil palm plantations. Individual plantations experienced net decline, net increase or U-shaped trajectories. The 2% difference in mean soil C stock in forest and nonforest derived oil palm plantations was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Unless soil management changes strongly from current practice, it is appropriate for C footprint calculations to assume soil C stock neutrality on mineral soils used for oil palm cultivation. 2015 Z. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

show abstract

“…Soil tillage, an important agronomic practice that requires considerable expense and high‐energy inputs, is performed to create favorable soil conditions for plant growth and development (Badalikova, 2010). Further, tillage is one of the most influential agricultural management practices that can alter soil physical, chemical, and biological properties and affect crop yield and quality (Strudley et al, 2008).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Three Tillage Depths on Sugarbeet Response and Soil Penetrability Resistance

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tillage can alter soil properties and aff ect crop yield and quality. A 4-yr study was conducted on a Lihen sandy loam soil loam (sandy, mixed, frigid Entic Haplustoll) to evaluate the eff ect of tillage depth on sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) root yield, root quality, and soil penetration resistance (PR). Tillage treatments consisted of no-tillage (NT), shallow tillage (ST), and deep tillage (DT). Soil PR was measured with a penetrometer in 2.5-cm increments to a 40-cm depth at three locations within each plot. Roots were hand harvested from each plot and each sample consisted of roots of two adjacent rows. Sugarbeet root yield and adjusted sucrose yield were not significantly aff ected by the depth of tillage in 2008, 2009, and 2011. In 2010, root yield was signifi cantly greater (16.5%) in DT than in NT. Th e average sugarbeet yields across 4 yr were 58.77, 60.30, and 63.03 Mg ha -1 for NT, ST, and DT, respectively. Root yield was lower in 2011 than other 3 yr due to cold and wet weather conditions in the spring. Soil PR values were signifi cantly lower in DT than in ST and NT from 5-to 30-cm depth. However, signifi cant diff erences were found between ST and NT at the 5-to 7.5-cm depth. Overall, DT enhanced soil physical environment but on average across 4 yr had no statistically signifi cant eff ect on sugarbeet root yield and quality compared to both ST and NT practices, though a trend was noted that as tillage depth increased root yield increased.

show abstract

Influence of Soil Tillage on Soil Compaction

Cited by 40 publications

References 7 publications

The influence of different tillage practices on water content of soil and crop yield in vetch–winter wheat rotation compared to fallow–winter wheat rotation in a high altitude and cool climate

The influence of different tillage practices on water content of soil and crop yield in vetch–winter wheat rotation compared to fallow–winter wheat rotation in a high altitude and cool climate

Carbon neutral? No change in mineral soil carbon stock under oil palm plantations derived from forest or non-forest in Indonesia

Effect of Three Tillage Depths on Sugarbeet Response and Soil Penetrability Resistance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About