1972
DOI: 10.4141/cjss72-059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Soil Bulk Density and Matric Pressure on Soil Resistance to Penetration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
11

Year Published

1978
1978
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples were prepared following similar procedures to those of Hill and Sumner (1967) and Mirreh and Ketcheson (1972). Air-dry sieved « 2 mm) soil was used to prepare the soil cores.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were prepared following similar procedures to those of Hill and Sumner (1967) and Mirreh and Ketcheson (1972). Air-dry sieved « 2 mm) soil was used to prepare the soil cores.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation is complicated by the variability in soil strength and the number of soil properties found to affect it (Cassel et al, 1978;Tsegaye and Hill, 1998). Soil properties affecting strength include texture and organic matter content (Spivey et a1.,1986), water content (Ayers and Perumperal, 1982;Busscher et al, 1997;Lehrsch et al, 1982), bulk density (Taylor and Gardner, 1963;Camp and Lund, 1968;Mirreh and Ketcheson, 1972), cementation (Poch and Verplancke, 1997), and profile soil property variation (Cassel et al, 1978). Sojka et al (1991) found a strong correlation between mean profile soil strength and corn (Zea mays L.) yield on Norfolk loamy sand, a southeastern Coastal Plain Paleudult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A resistência à penetração depende da densidade do solo e do teor de umidade deste, aumentando com a diminuição da umidade e com o aumento da densidade (Mirreh & Ketcheson, 1972). Sendo assim, a maior resistência da trilha, em relação às demais classes, seria função da maior densidade do solo sob este tratamento, uma vez que, no momento da leitura, os valores de umidade volumétrica não apresentaram diferença significativa entre as diferentes classes (Figura 4).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified