Influence of Social Cognitive Cooperation Model with Techniques of Cognitive Restructuring and Engineering Modeling on Self Abasement Students

Abstract

This research is a quasi research ("Quasi Experiment"). The purpose of this research is to know the technique of Cognitive Restructuring in Cognitive Social counseling model influence to Self abasement of class X AP A student, to know Modeling technique in Cognitive Social counseling model influence to Verbal Talent of grade X AP B students, and to know the difference of technique influence Cognitive Restructuring with Modeling techniques in Social Cognitive counseling model on Self Abasement students. The process of collecting data in this study using observation sheet, interview sheet, diary and Self Abasement questionnaire. Data analysis method used is t-test. From this research the technique of Cognitive Restructuring is more influential than the modeling model of Social Cognitive counseling model in improving Self Abasement of the students of class X AP SMK Negeri 1 Singaraja.

Efektivitas Model Konseling Restrukturisasi Kognitif Untuk Meningkatkan Aspek Reflecting Dan Adaptive Help Seeking Mahasiswa

“…(Masdelina et al, 2023). Penggunaan konseling restrukturisasi kognitif ini menunjukkan bahwa mahasiswa tidak hanya dapat mengatasi kesulitan akademik, tetapi juga dapat memanfaatkan sumber daya internal dan eksternal mereka untuk mencapai keberhasilan dalam proses pembelajaran (Aprilia Ningsih et al, 2023). Dengan demikian, rekomendasi operasional yang dapat diambil adalah memperluas implementasi konseling restrukturisasi kognitif dalam lingkungan universitas, dengan fokus pada penerapan teknik restrukturisasi kognitif yang sesuai untuk membantu mahasiswa mengembangkan resiliensi akademik mereka.…”

The Effectiveness of Behavioral Counseling as Intervention of Abasement, Aggression, and Endurance of High School Students

“…The nature of abasement, the nature of endurance, and the nature of aggression must be at an ideal level so that individuals avoid problems. Diastuti et al (2017) stated that 42% of students had problems because they had low abasement properties. Low abasement is indicated by the attitude of not accepting punishment for mistakes that have been committed, violating class time rules, and negatively fighting the teacher when given advice.…”