2016
DOI: 10.1080/10042857.2016.1149297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of social capital on farmer household income gap: total effect and structural effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have started to focus more on the role of social capital in reducing the income gap of farmers. For example, Wang and Lu (2016) examined the impact of social capital on the farmers' income gap through the shapely value theory of social structure and the total amount of social capital in Shaanxi Province, China. The findings reveal that social capital could inflate small farmers' income gap, and the dimension of social capital can also increase farmers' income gap and structural impact of farmer's income gap on social participation, social trust, and social networks.…”
Section: Socioeconomic Status and Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have started to focus more on the role of social capital in reducing the income gap of farmers. For example, Wang and Lu (2016) examined the impact of social capital on the farmers' income gap through the shapely value theory of social structure and the total amount of social capital in Shaanxi Province, China. The findings reveal that social capital could inflate small farmers' income gap, and the dimension of social capital can also increase farmers' income gap and structural impact of farmer's income gap on social participation, social trust, and social networks.…”
Section: Socioeconomic Status and Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory of capital is increasingly relevant in regional studies (Borozan and Funaric, 2016;Bengoa, Román and Pérez, 2017). In particular, through cooperation in collective actions and participation in decision-making, an increase in generalized and institutional trust should act as a means of reducing economic inequality (Knack and Keefer, 1997;Putnam, 2000;Ram, 2012;Wang and Lu, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%