2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-018-8850-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of sintering temperature on the structural, electrical and microwave properties of yttrium iron garnet (YIG)

Abstract: This study investigates the structural, electrical and microwave properties of yttrium iron garnet (YIG) which focuses on the parallel evolving relationship with their dependence on the sintering temperature. The iron oxide obtained from the steel waste product (mill scale) was used to synthesize YIG. The raw mill scale underwent the milling and Curie temperature separation technique to produce high purity iron oxide powder which is the main raw material in preparing and fabricating YIG through high energy bal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the temperature of 800 • C a mixture of yttrium iron perovskite (YFeO 3 ) and α-Fe 2 O 3 was observed, while for samples further heated at the temperature of 1100 • C the only observed phase was Y 3 Fe 5 O 12 (Figure 2B). The obtained results agree with the literature reports approving that in the case of the mixture of Y 2 O 3 and Fe 2 O 3 the first reaction step is formation of perovskite structure YFeO 3 , and a further increase in temperature leads to further incorporation of iron leading to the formation of yttrium-iron garnet structure [30][31][32][33]. This effect was not observed for the powders synthesized by Method C and D as presented in Figure 1C,D).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the temperature of 800 • C a mixture of yttrium iron perovskite (YFeO 3 ) and α-Fe 2 O 3 was observed, while for samples further heated at the temperature of 1100 • C the only observed phase was Y 3 Fe 5 O 12 (Figure 2B). The obtained results agree with the literature reports approving that in the case of the mixture of Y 2 O 3 and Fe 2 O 3 the first reaction step is formation of perovskite structure YFeO 3 , and a further increase in temperature leads to further incorporation of iron leading to the formation of yttrium-iron garnet structure [30][31][32][33]. This effect was not observed for the powders synthesized by Method C and D as presented in Figure 1C,D).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…At the temperature of 800 °C a mixture of yttrium iron perovskite (YFeO3) and α-Fe2O3 was observed, while for samples further heated at the temperature of 1100 °C the only observed phase was Y3Fe5O12 (Figure 2B). The obtained results agree with the literature reports approving that in the case of the mixture of Y2O3 and Fe2O3 the first reaction step is formation of perovskite structure YFeO3, and a further increase in temperature leads to further incorporation of iron leading to the formation of yttrium-iron garnet structure [30][31][32][33]. An analysis of dilatometric curves (Figure 3A-D) concludes that in the case of the precursor of yttrium iron garnet obtained by Method A and Method B at temperature of 751.2 • C and 742.9 • C, respectively, which corresponds to the reaction of the YFeO 3 formation, we observe a faster change in the linear dimension of the sample.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The much higher absorption is expected to occur at a much higher frequency due to a higher anisotropy field of BaFe 12 O 19 . At X-band (8)(9)(10)(11)(12) frequency, the barium ferrite shows the dielectric and magnetic permeability properties with low attenuation ability [13]. 7.…”
Section: Fig 2x-ray Diffraction Pattern Of Bafe 12 O 19 At 800 900mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, prolonged the milling time used to get purified Fe3O4. [6,7,8,9]. The magnetite (Fe3O4) yielded from CTST was dried in oven at 120 o C for 24 h. The structural and phase composition of samples were analyzed from X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern, characterized using a Philips Expert PW3040 diffractometer operated at 40 kV and 40 mA with CuKα radiation (λ = 0.154 nm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%