2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-019-04446-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Single-Point Incremental Force Process Parameters on Forming Characteristics and Microstructure Evolution of AA-6061 Alloy Sheet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was very clear that sheet thickness reduction is maximum for wall angle of 50° and minimum for wall angle of 30°. Thinning was observed more on the wall region of the component as observed by Barnwal et al 17…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was very clear that sheet thickness reduction is maximum for wall angle of 50° and minimum for wall angle of 30°. Thinning was observed more on the wall region of the component as observed by Barnwal et al 17…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…It was very clear that sheet thickness reduction is maximum for wall angle of 50°and minimum for wall angle of 30°. Thinning was observed more on the wall region of the component as observed by Barnwal et al 17 Localized plastic deformation causes the minimal thickness variation in the later stage. Increased wall angle causes the sheet to be subjected to additional shearing action, resulting in increased thickness reduction and sheet fracture as reported by Honarpisheh et al 18 As observed by Shrivastava et al, 19 the thickness reduction values obtained from experimental studies are consistent with the theoretical cosine law, and it is evident that formability will be highest for materials with larger initial thickness.…”
Section: Thickness Of Formed Componentssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Tool size is an essential factor that affects the properties of SPIF components, since increasing the tool diameter causes a decrease in the hardness of AA1100 aluminium [63], whereas decreasing it causes higher formability and a lowering of the forming force of a commercially pure titanium (CP-Ti) sheet [64]. This, together with the vertical depth, significantly affects the thickness homogeneity of the AA-6061 (T6) aluminium alloy sheet after forming [65].…”
Section: Forming Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the SPIF process, whether the sheet metal thickness is uniform or not directly affects the final forming quality; hence, thickness uniformity can be considered an indicator of formability to prevent the local thinning from becoming serious. Barnwal et al [10] investigated the formability of the cone by analyzing the thickness strain distribution of the components. This study reveals that the process parameters are likely to influence the texture development, especially for large tool head diameters and vertical pitch values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%