Influence of silicone surface roughness and hydrophobicity on adhesion and colonization of Staphylococcus epidermidis

Abstract

Bacterial adhesion and colonization are complicated processes that depend on many factors, including surface chemistry, hydrophobicity, and surface roughness. The contribution of each of these factors has not been fully elucidated because most previous studies used different polymeric surfaces to achieve differences in properties. The objective of this study was to modify hydrophobicity and roughness on one polymeric surface, eliminating the confounding contribution of surface chemistry. Mechanically assembled monolayer (MAM) preparation methods (both one- and two-dimensional) were used to impart different degrees of hydrophobicity on fluoroalkylsilane (FAS)-coated silicone. Surface roughness was varied by casting the silicone to templates prepared with different abrasives. Surface hydrophobicity was determined by contact angle measurement, whereas surface roughness was determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Bacterial adhesion and colonization were analyzed using a direct colony-counting method and SEM images. Hydrophobicity increased as a function of stretched length or width (Deltax or Deltay); it reached a maximum at Deltax = 60% with one-dimensional MAM and decreased as Deltax further increased to 80 and 100%. The same trend was observed for the two-dimensional MAM. After 12-h incubation, all the FAS/silicone surfaces had significantly reduced adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis by 42-89%, compared to untreated silicone, and the degree of which is inversely related to surface hydrophobicity. On the other hand, surface roughness had a significant effect on bacterial adhesion and colonization only when the root-mean-square roughness was higher than 200 nm.

Antimicrobial behavior of novel surfaces generated by electrophoretic deposition and breakdown anodization

“…4b); therefore, the possible observed trend is only dependent on roughness. This is supported by a previous study reporting a positive correlation of increasing attachment with roughness [63]. Fig.…”

CHAPTER 13. Bacterial Adhesion and Interaction with Biomaterial Surfaces

“…104, 105 Tang et al reported that surface roughness significantly affects the adhesion of S. epidermidis on silicon surfaces only when the root-meansquare roughness was higher than 200 nm. 106 The studies of influence of physical structuring of surface nanofeatures on bacterial adhesion further revealed the role of surface roughness in bacterial adhesion. Whitehead et al 107 measured the bacterial adhesion on Si wafers coated with titanium having featured surface pit sizes of 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2 mm in diameter and different depths, resulting in R a values ranging from 45 to 220 nm.…”

Implications and emerging control strategies for ventilator-associated infections

“…In vitro Hydrophobic surface resulted in higher attachment of bacterium [108] In vitro Up to 89% reduction in bacterial adhesion on hydrophobic surface [107,109] P Triclosan and bronopol S. aureus In vitro 80% of cells were killed but no effect in terms of colonization [30] Escherichia coli In vitro Triclosan was more effective than bronopol [30] Bronopol, bezalkonium chloride and chlorohexidine S. aureus and E. coli…”