2019
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of significant others on work participation of individuals with chronic diseases: a systematic review

Abstract: ObjectiveIt is widely recognised that significant others (SOs), such as a partner, family member or friend, can influence health outcomes of individuals with a chronic disease. However, not much is known about which specific cognitions (ie, illness perceptions and expectation of work ability) and behaviours (eg, emotional and practical support) of SOs influence work participation. Therefore, we aimed to identify cognitions and behaviours of SOs that are related to work participation of individuals with a chron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(78 reference statements)
2
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…If -as in our study -there is an increase in quality of life, the interaction with SOs may become easier, thus facilitating patients' integration into everyday (work) life [27]. If -as in our study -there is an increase in quality of life, the interaction with SOs may become easier, thus facilitating patients' integration into everyday (work) life [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If -as in our study -there is an increase in quality of life, the interaction with SOs may become easier, thus facilitating patients' integration into everyday (work) life [27]. If -as in our study -there is an increase in quality of life, the interaction with SOs may become easier, thus facilitating patients' integration into everyday (work) life [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…A recent review article that included 18 moderate-to-high quality studies (out of 5,168 publications) of patients with chronic diseases revealed that a positive or negative attitude of SOs (significant others, i.e., partners, family members, relatives, and friends) towards work participation has corresponding effects on these patients. If -as in our study -there is an increase in quality of life, the interaction with SOs may become easier, thus facilitating patients' integration into everyday (work) life [27]. Even though in our cohort (mean age in the 7 th decade) reintegration into professional life may not play a major role, integration into everyday life as a result of improved quality of life is a fundamental aspect of patients' well-being.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in line with prior research that indicates that SOs' cognitions (e.g., illness perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes) and behavioral responses (e.g., social support and negative or solicitous responses) can influence how workers cope with chronic disease [10][11][12][13][14][15]. More specifically, in a recent systematic review, we found that SOs' positive and encouraging attitudes regarding work participation, encouragement and motivating behavior and open communication with workers can facilitate work participation [4]. On the other hand, SO's positive attitudes towards sickness absence and advise, encouragement or pressure to refrain from work can hinder work participation of workers with a chronic disease.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…As we were interested in assessment practices of OHPs concerning SOs of workers, we specified SOs as a partner, family members, or friends at the start of the survey. To measure OHPs' current assessment practices, we used three constructs, derived from our recently published systematic review [4], namely assessment of SOs' (i) illness perceptions, (ii) work-related beliefs and expectations, and (iii) supportive and unsupportive behavioral responses. For all three constructs, items were derived from existing questionnaires and adapted to the purpose of this survey.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation