1993
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7519(93)90034-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of sex and reproductive status on susceptibility of ruminants to nematode parasitism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
93
2
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
10
93
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively moderate egg production measured on the pasture during the third sampling period in the summer of 1992 after a very large quantity of infective larvae had been ingested, indicates the existence of a strong regulation of the worm population. The significant effects of sex and reproductive status were consistent with the usual results reported in the literature: the higher resistance of females than males, and a periparturient rise in egg output [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The relatively moderate egg production measured on the pasture during the third sampling period in the summer of 1992 after a very large quantity of infective larvae had been ingested, indicates the existence of a strong regulation of the worm population. The significant effects of sex and reproductive status were consistent with the usual results reported in the literature: the higher resistance of females than males, and a periparturient rise in egg output [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. as well as sex of lambs had no effect on any of the parasitological parameters (Table 4). Many studies have reported that male sheep are more susceptible than females to natural or experimental nematode infections around or after the age of puberty (Courtney et al, 1985;Barger, 1993).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We fitted gender, starting weight, and a gene-specific combined effect of SNP TXNIP genotype (AA, AB) and infection (A. suum-infected, uninfected) as fixed effects (Barger 1993). Pig, litter of origin, pen, and necropsy day were fitted as random effects.…”
Section: Data Processing and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%