2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcp.2014.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of sequence mismatches on the specificity of recombinase polymerase amplification technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
130
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
130
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the GII.3 template was inconsistently amplified by the NOF5-NOR11-NOP1 primer-probe set, the amplified region of which contained base mismatches on the 3′ end of NOF5 and NOR11 target regions in addition to a large number of mismatches (Table 4). Such placement of mismatches was found by Daher et al 34. to be more inhibitory to amplification than internal or 5′ mismatches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, the GII.3 template was inconsistently amplified by the NOF5-NOR11-NOP1 primer-probe set, the amplified region of which contained base mismatches on the 3′ end of NOF5 and NOR11 target regions in addition to a large number of mismatches (Table 4). Such placement of mismatches was found by Daher et al 34. to be more inhibitory to amplification than internal or 5′ mismatches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In our report, GII.4 Sydney containing 6 total mismatches in the target region was readily amplified. The data of Daher et al 34,. which focused on using RPA for amplification of conserved genes for several bacteria, showed a similar tolerance to base pair mismatches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It has been reported that target specific RPA primers with mismatches at their 3' end can prevent amplification with RPA (Daher et al, 2015). Within the 174 sequences that amplified there were 16 (9.1%) that had a single mismatch within the first three bases at the 3’ end of the forward primer and one isolate, KF716479, had mismatches at both positions 1 and 3 and yet still amplified 100 copies of RNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular the group O isolates had significant mismatches to the assay primer/probe sequences with a total of 13–15 polymorphisms (6–7 of which were in the reverse primer) and yet were reproducibly detected at the 100 copy level. In contrast, the sequence analysis of the isolates that did not efficiently amplify had relatively fewer mismatches (range 5–6), most of which were not in the 3’ end of the primer binding sites (Daher et al, 2014). As others have observed, we did note that mismatches at the 3’ end of a primer prevented amplification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FMDV serotype C, SAT1–3, SVDV, VESV and SVA were not included in the analytical specificity analysis, which is a shortcoming of this study. RPA is tolerant to 5–9 mismatches in primer and probe showing no influence on the performance of the assay [20, 28], and the maximum number of mismatches found within one sequence was four in some FMDV serotypes available in GenBank (e.g. accession numbers DQ533483, HQ412603, KU821590, JF749862, KJ820999, and KT968663).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%