2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00770-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of semen processing technique on human sperm DNA integrity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
122
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
12
122
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Zini et al, however, demonstrated a significant increase in sperm with undamaged DNA after seminal processing performed by swim-up. This increase was not observed when density gradient discontinous centrifugation was performed in the same samples [39]. A study by our group also demonstrated that semen processing by a discontinuous density gradient did not improve apoptotic SD standard deviation, 95% CI 95% confidence interval of the mean *p<α DNA fragmentation, evaluated by the TUNEL technique [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Zini et al, however, demonstrated a significant increase in sperm with undamaged DNA after seminal processing performed by swim-up. This increase was not observed when density gradient discontinous centrifugation was performed in the same samples [39]. A study by our group also demonstrated that semen processing by a discontinuous density gradient did not improve apoptotic SD standard deviation, 95% CI 95% confidence interval of the mean *p<α DNA fragmentation, evaluated by the TUNEL technique [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…While one study showed that the DGC is more effective than SUP in reducing the percentage of sperm with DNA damage [25], another one, in contrast, demonstrated that SUP recovers lower percentage of sperm with fragmented DNA as compared to DGC [37]. Enciso et al [11] showed that SUP and DGC are equally efficient in eliminating spermatozoa containing double-strand DNA damage and sperm with highly damaged DNA, as characterized by the presence of both single-and double-strand DNA breaks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have investigated the efficacy of these methods with regards to the recovery of reduced percentage of sperm cells with fragmented DNA, however the results are still controversial [30,31,36,37]. While one study showed that the DGC is more effective than SUP in reducing the percentage of sperm with DNA damage [25], another one, in contrast, demonstrated that SUP recovers lower percentage of sperm with fragmented DNA as compared to DGC [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data are important because exposing spermatozoa to high levels of ROS may cause DNA fragmentation, which may have adverse consequences if they are used for assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs) (45). This may be true particularly in light of a recent report by Zini and co-workers (46), who found that the improvement in sperm motility after Percoll processing was not associated with a similar improvement in sperm DNA integrity. Those investigators recommended that the current sperm preparation techniques be reevaluated with the goal of minimizing sperm DNA damage.…”
Section: Reactive Oxygen Species and Male Infertilitymentioning
confidence: 99%