1995
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(94)00150-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of selector technology on heavy metal removal by activated sludge: Secondary effects of selector technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selector tank was divided into four compartments. The first and second compartments each had liquid volumes of 160 cm 3 ; the liquid volume of the third and fourth compartments was 190 cm 3 each.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The selector tank was divided into four compartments. The first and second compartments each had liquid volumes of 160 cm 3 ; the liquid volume of the third and fourth compartments was 190 cm 3 each.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aeration tanks were cylindrical and made of translucent plastic. The liquid volume of the aeration tanks was 5 dm 3 . The clarifiers had a liquid volume of 1.8 dm 3 , were conical in shape and made from 304-grade stainless steel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Heavy metals may be removed by biosorption from wastewater in secondary treatment (Brown et al, 1973;Kim et al, 2002;Su et al, 1995;Tien and Huang, 1987) as well as from soils and sediments in bioremediation (Lovley and Coates, 1997). This phenomenon is often attributed to the binding of metals onto the bacterial cell surface (Beveridge and Murray, 1976;Cox et al, 1999;Lawson et al, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%