Influence of selective comorbidity predictors on functional recovery after hip fracture in an older population

Radosavljevic, Natasa; Lazović, Milica; Nikolić, Dejan; Petronić, Ivana; Radosavljevic, Zoran; Jeremić, Aleksandar

doi:10.5507/bp.2012.102

Cited by 9 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For an explanation of relative variability, we used coefficient of variation (V) that was expressed as percent and calculated as the ratio between standard deviation and mean value for the observed parameter. For evaluation and quantification of variability that can be explained between different CIRS-G severity degrees and the values of physical functioning of SF-36 questionnaire for evaluated CIRS-G parameters (musculoskeletal impairment), we introduced η2 = sum of squares (between groups)/sum of squares (total) × 100, where sum of squares were gained from the one-way ANOVA test and results were presented as a percentage (%) [5]. For evaluation and quantification of variability that can be explained between different times of evaluation for the same level of CIRS-G severity musculoskeletal impairment and the values of physical functioning of SF-36 questionnaire, we introduced η2 as well.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regarding the time of examination, eligible participants that were included into the study were tested on three occasions: at admission, at discharge, and at three months post-discharge. Musculoskeletal impairments were analyzed, and for the estimation of severity degree impairment we used cumulative index rating scale for geriatrics (CIRS-G) in the range between 0-4 only at admission, where 0-refers to the condition with no impairment, 1-refers to mild, 2-refers to moderate, 3-refers to severe, and 4-refers to extremely severe impairment [5,9]. Regarding gender, we separately analyzed males and females.…”

Section: Study Groupmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The cornerstone of in-hospital rehabilitation for patients admitted and treated for hip fracture is basic mobility enhancement. Numerous studies evaluated predictors that might be associated with mobility and functional improvement during the period of in-hospital rehabilitation [3][4][5][6]. Further, it was noticed that gender might be a factor that could influence rehabilitation outcome in aged adults after a hip fracture, thus affecting therapeutic decision making and requiring adjustments for certain interventions regarding better functional restoration [7,8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Gender and Musculoskeletal Comorbidity Impact on Physical Functioning in Elderly after Hip Fracture: The Role of Rehabilitation

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study aim was to evaluate the effects of presence and level of musculoskeletal impairment along with gender on physical functioning outcome after the rehabilitation program in aged adults with a hip fracture. We analyzed 203 elderly people with hip fractures above 65 years of age that were treated after the hip surgery. According to the time of examination, patients were tested three times: at admission, discharge, and at three months post-discharge. Musculoskeletal impairments were analyzed, and for the estimation of severity of degree impairment, we used a cumulative index rating scale for geriatrics (CIRS-G). Regarding the gender, we separately analyzed males and females. To evaluate physical functioning of aged adults after a hip fracture, we used the physical functioning component (PFC) from the quality of life (SF-36) questionnaire. For males, on all three occasions we found non-significant differences were found in SF-36 PFC values between different degrees of CIRS-G musculoskeletal impairment. A significant difference was noticed in females three months post-discharge. Effects size of different examination periods for every CIRS-G severity degree of musculoskeletal impairment were high, where males had higher values for severity degrees 1 and 2, and females had higher values for severity degrees 0 and 3. Our findings might suggest that there is a certain degree of different rehabilitation treatment effects for males versus females. Moreover, it might be assumed that other factors could influence different degrees of functional improvement and outcome of individuals after a hip fracture with musculoskeletal impairment.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Groupmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Gender and Musculoskeletal Comorbidity Impact on Physical Functioning in Elderly after Hip Fracture: The Role of Rehabilitation

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To explain and quantify variability that can be explained between different degrees for each Item for DVSS SR and Gender or Education, we introduced η2 = Sum of squares (Between groups)/Sum of squares (Total) × 100, where sum of squares was generated from a one-way ANOVA test and results were presented as percentage (%) [ 17 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of Serbian Version of Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS) Questionnaire

Ćirović

Petronić

Nikolić

et al. 2018

JCM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aims of our study were to translate the dysfunctional voiding symptom score (DVSS) from English to Serbian; culturally adopt the items; assess the internal consistency and the test–retest reliability of DVSSSR in patients with dysfunctional voiding (DV); evaluate and test the construct and divergent validity of DVSSSR against demographic parameters (gender and education); and examine the level of explained variability for each item of DVSSSR against demographic parameters (gender and education). Methods: The cross-sectional observational study included 50 patients with dysfunctional voiding aged 5 years and above. The DVSS questionnaire was translated from English into Serbian by the forward–backward method. Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach α and test–retest reliability with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). For validity testing we performed construct and divergent validity analyses. Results: There was excellent internal consistency for every item except for Item 6 (0.787) and Item 3 (0.864), where internal consistency was good. The observed test/retest ICC for average measures was more than 0.75 (excellent) for all DVSSSR items. Gender and educational level does not correlate significantly with each item of DVSSSR (p > 0.05). For divergent validity, there were no significant differences in mean values of each item of DVSSSR between genders and different levels of education (p > 0.05). Variability that can be explained for gender and educational level was below 10%. Conclusion: Translated DVSSSR is of adequate validity and reliability for assessing DV in children.

show abstract

“…For the gradation of impairment severity we used Cumulative index rating scale for geriatrics (CIRS-G) in the range between 0-4, where 0- refers to the condition with no impairment, 1- refers to mild, 2- moderate, 3- severe and 4- extremely severe impairment. 5 , 6 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comorbidity Impact on Social Functioning After Hip Fracture: The Role of Rehabilitation

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To analyze the impact of rehabilitation treatment on social functioning in elderly patients after hip fracture during a rehabilitation program.Methods:This study included 203 patients with hip fracture. Four groups were analyzed on rehabilitation: Group 1, at admission, Group 2, at discharge, Group 3, three months after discharge and Group 4, six months after discharge. The analyzed parameters included: musculoskeletal, neurological and cognitive impairments. Impairment severity was graded by cumulative index rating scale for geriatrics (CIRS-G). Evaluation of social functioning was completed by social functioning component (SFC) from quality of life (SF-36) questionnaire.Results: There was a significant improvement in SF-36 SFC values for observed impairments from admission to six months after discharge for each severity degree (p<0.01), except for CIRS-G severity degree 4 for cognitive impairment, where significance was p<0.05. For the group of patients with musculoskeletal impairment, there was a significant difference between the values of SF-36 SFC concerning different severity degrees of CIRS-G only at six months after discharge (p<0.05). Patients with neurological or cognitive impairments have shown significant differences between the values of SF-36 SFC in regard to severity degrees of CIRS-G in all observational groups.Conclusion: Different degrees of observed impairments influence the degree of social functioning recovery in the elderly after hip fracture. Level of Evidence II, Prognostic Studies .

show abstract

Influence of selective comorbidity predictors on functional recovery after hip fracture in an older population

Cited by 9 publications

References 20 publications

Gender and Musculoskeletal Comorbidity Impact on Physical Functioning in Elderly after Hip Fracture: The Role of Rehabilitation

Gender and Musculoskeletal Comorbidity Impact on Physical Functioning in Elderly after Hip Fracture: The Role of Rehabilitation

Validation of Serbian Version of Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS) Questionnaire

Comorbidity Impact on Social Functioning After Hip Fracture: The Role of Rehabilitation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About