2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Search Algorithms on Aerodynamic Design Optimisation of Aircraft Wings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When applied to aerodynamic shape optimization problems, the swarm algorithms consistently outperform genetic algorithms in terms of efficiency 45 and exploration ability. 46 The issues with global search algorithms are primarily expense, requiring more objective function evaluations, often as much as two orders of magnitude more, which can pose problems within the aerodynamic shape optimization framework, although parallelisation of the objective function evaluations at each evaluation can dilute this issue.…”
Section: Iib Global Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When applied to aerodynamic shape optimization problems, the swarm algorithms consistently outperform genetic algorithms in terms of efficiency 45 and exploration ability. 46 The issues with global search algorithms are primarily expense, requiring more objective function evaluations, often as much as two orders of magnitude more, which can pose problems within the aerodynamic shape optimization framework, although parallelisation of the objective function evaluations at each evaluation can dilute this issue.…”
Section: Iib Global Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular type of global search algorithm in ASO are evolutionary-based (genetic algorithms and differential evolution), which have been successfully used for single-47, 48 and multi-point 49 optimization of aerofoils, and wing section optimization. 50 The particle swarm algorithm is the most widely used agent-based system within the wider optimization field, and so has also been used for aerofoil 51 and wing optimizations, 52 although when comparing particle swarm and evolutionary algorithms, particle swarm tends to perform more efficiently and effectively, 45,46 indicating that the swarm algorithms designed for continuous optimization are more effective.…”
Section: Iib Global Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the substantial cost of using a global optimization approach for an ASO problem, and the apparent lack of multimodality in a number of ASO problems, global optimizers have had only a small use in ASO, see [37][38][39][40][41] for example. However, to investigate the mutimodality of the ADODG multimodal benchmark problem, a state-of-the-art constrained global optimization framework [42] is employed here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of conventional nature-inspired methods to aerodynamic optimization has been significant (see, for example [4,[39][40][41][42][43][44] ), however the use of niching methods is much less despite the clear motivation to locate multiple optima in aerodynamic problems. The main application of such approaches to date is from Obayashi et al [45] who used niching techniques to locate the pareto front of a multi-objective wing design problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%