2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of sampling time and sap extraction methodology on xylem pH values in two grapevine varieties grown under drought conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Xylem sap was extracted from a 15-cm branch using the pressure chamber technique according to the following methodology [ 78 ]: after the balancing pressure was reached, the cut surface was blotted dry. Initially, the pressure was applied slowly at a rate of 0.03 MPa/min until the first droplets of xylem sap reached the surface of the cut.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xylem sap was extracted from a 15-cm branch using the pressure chamber technique according to the following methodology [ 78 ]: after the balancing pressure was reached, the cut surface was blotted dry. Initially, the pressure was applied slowly at a rate of 0.03 MPa/min until the first droplets of xylem sap reached the surface of the cut.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predicted scenarios of climate change over the next decade include lengthening of the drought period leading to extended and severe drought events and enhanced levels of incident UV‐B radiation (Schultz 2000, Giorgi and Lionello 2008). While several studies seemed to confirm grapevine defence mechanisms against drought (Schultz 2003, Beis et al. 2009) and supplemental UV‐B radiation (Lafontaine et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The changes in xylem sap pH determined in our experiments were not large, but by the time that the plants were big enough for xylem sap sampling, the effect of the presence of neighbours on g s had already diminished in comparison to that determined for younger plants. In addition, sap sourced from within the leaf apoplast (which cannot easily be sampled in isolation) is usually more alkaline than that sampled, like ours, as an amalgamation of stem xylem sap and leaf apoplastic sap, particularly if sampled post‐dawn (Davies, Wilkinson & Loveys 2002; Beis, Zotos & Patakas 2009). Thus, the true extent of the competition‐induced rise in alkalinity in the leaf may have been obscured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%