2019
DOI: 10.1080/07038992.2019.1669013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Sampling Design Parameters on Biomass Predictions Derived from Airborne LiDAR Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the investigated control stands generally exhibited a one-layer vertical structure, no substantial error was expected from this simplification. Moreover, Bouvier et al (2019) stressed that DBH/height measurement errors impose a minor to negligible effect upon LiDAR-based biomass estimation for even-aged pine stands. The stand boundaries were first delineated with a GNSS receiver and (if required) manually adjusted based on the canopy height model derived from the ALS data.…”
Section: Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the investigated control stands generally exhibited a one-layer vertical structure, no substantial error was expected from this simplification. Moreover, Bouvier et al (2019) stressed that DBH/height measurement errors impose a minor to negligible effect upon LiDAR-based biomass estimation for even-aged pine stands. The stand boundaries were first delineated with a GNSS receiver and (if required) manually adjusted based on the canopy height model derived from the ALS data.…”
Section: Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the accuracy of ALS-based AGB models can vary by species and forest types [21]. Bouvier et al [22] demonstrated, that plot size significantly impacted AGB model performance within pine forest in southwestern France. The accuracy of ALS-based models can potentially vary with the ALS data point density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…aerial and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV)), studies have recommended further investigation of variation in acquisition parameters for forest parameter assessment (Cao et al, 2016;Korhonen et al, 2011;Tompalski et al, 2019). Some studies focussed on the effect of point density on the accuracy of stand attribute predictions (Bouvier et al, 2019;Naesset, 2009;Singh et al, 2016). Relevant lidar metrics selected to build predictive models were found to differ significantly with pulse density in Naesset, (2009) but in Bouvier et al, (2019) there was no change in the four metrics used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies focussed on the effect of point density on the accuracy of stand attribute predictions (Bouvier et al, 2019;Naesset, 2009;Singh et al, 2016). Relevant lidar metrics selected to build predictive models were found to differ significantly with pulse density in Naesset, (2009) but in Bouvier et al, (2019) there was no change in the four metrics used. However, in the range of explored pulse densities, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%