1999
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-56-9-1600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of salmon spawner densities on stream productivity in Southeast Alaska

Abstract: Abstract:We conducted this study to determine the relationship between salmon spawner abundance and stream biofilm and benthic macroinvertebrate abundance in Southeast Alaska. Experiments took place in outdoor artificial and natural streams. Six pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) carcass treatments (0.00, 1.45, 2.90, 4.35, 5.80, and 7.25 kg wet mass) placed in artificial channels were subsampled repeatedly for biofilm ash-free dry mass (AFDM), chlorophyll a, and macroinvertebrates. In a small (nonanadromous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
65
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
9
65
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, without spatial and temporal controls (e.g., upstream of a barrier to salmon), apparent treatment effects may be incorrectly attributed to salmon. While positive results from experimental additions of salmon material (e.g., Wipfli et al 1999;Wilzbach et al 2005, and unpublished data) lead us to doubt that salmon indeed have no effect on NO 3 and AFDM, our results suggest that effects may differ substantially depending on the use of spatial or temporal controls (e.g., Chaloner et al 2007). Accounting for both temporal and spatial variation inherent in the system increases confidence in attributing apparent treatment effects to the presence of salmon.…”
Section: Methodology Of Salmon Experiments-when Are Observations Realmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, without spatial and temporal controls (e.g., upstream of a barrier to salmon), apparent treatment effects may be incorrectly attributed to salmon. While positive results from experimental additions of salmon material (e.g., Wipfli et al 1999;Wilzbach et al 2005, and unpublished data) lead us to doubt that salmon indeed have no effect on NO 3 and AFDM, our results suggest that effects may differ substantially depending on the use of spatial or temporal controls (e.g., Chaloner et al 2007). Accounting for both temporal and spatial variation inherent in the system increases confidence in attributing apparent treatment effects to the presence of salmon.…”
Section: Methodology Of Salmon Experiments-when Are Observations Realmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Interestingly, effect sizes for carcass addition studies were never substantially greater than for natural salmon runs, suggesting an upper limit to the rate of nutrient mineralization and subsequent uptake and incorporation by aquatic organisms (cf. Wipfli et al 1999Wipfli et al , 2003Bilby et al 2001;Chaloner et al 2002), as well as a higher potency for live salmon than for carcasses.…”
Section: Methodology Of Salmon Experiments-when Are Observations Realmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, .1.58 3 10 5 salmon carcasses have been placed in Oregon streams since 1995 (Compton et al 2006). Numerous experiments have placed salmon carcasses in streams and monitored the bottom-up (fertilizing) impacts of salmon carcasses on streams (e.g., Wipfli et al 1999). However, our study suggests that a stream filled with live nest-digging salmon and their eventual carcasses has much different nutrient and matter cycling, retention, and movement than a stream filled with only carcasses.…”
Section: Conservation Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nitrogen and phosphorous) (Wipfli et al, 1999). The spawning of anadromous fish delivers biological materials in the form of excretory products, gametes and carcasses that are enriched in nutrients (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%