2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of S-dodecylmercaptobenzimidazole as organic additive on electrodeposition of tin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a constant applied current intensity, the addition of NS additive moved the cathodic reduction potential of the system. This is one of the most interesting, because most deposits are made in galvanostatic mode and the introduction of such an overvoltage may contribute to achieving codeposition with an element having a potential of more cathodic reduction [22].…”
Section: Galvanostatic Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For a constant applied current intensity, the addition of NS additive moved the cathodic reduction potential of the system. This is one of the most interesting, because most deposits are made in galvanostatic mode and the introduction of such an overvoltage may contribute to achieving codeposition with an element having a potential of more cathodic reduction [22].…”
Section: Galvanostatic Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of sprouting loop shows that the metal deposition does not occur by a three-dimensional germination (3D). The return curve is also marked by a cathodic-anodic current transition characterizing rapid dissolution of the deposit [22].…”
Section: Linear Sweep Voltammetry and Cyclic Voltammetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The electrode was weighed before and after the realization of the deposit. The electrodeposition rate was calculated from the Weight-gain by the formula below 12 .…”
Section: Gravimetric Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result was obtained with others additives 13,16 . This is caused by the adsorption of the additive on the working electrode surface [12][13][14][15][16] , which impeded the charge transfer 17,18 . To prevent the oxidation of the working electrode during cyclic voltammetry measurements, iron was replaced by copper working electrode.…”
Section: Chronopotentiometric Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%