2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.82.245410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of roughness on near-field heat transfer between two plates

Abstract: The surface roughness correction to the near-field heat transfer between two rough bulk materials is discussed by using second-order perturbation theory. The results allow for estimating the impact of surface roughness to the heat transfer in recent experiments between two plates and between a micro-sphere and a plate (using the Derjaguin approximation). Furthermore, we show that the proximity approximation for describing rough surfaces is valid for distances much smaller than the correlation length of the sur… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The enhancement of HT in the near-field regime (generally denoting separations small compared to the thermal wavelength, which is roughly 8 microns at room temperature) has only recently been verified experimentally [5,6]. Theoretically, HT has been considered for a limited number of shapes: Parallel plates [2,3,7,8], a dipole or sphere in front a plate [9][10][11], two dipoles or spheres [9,12,13], and for a cone and a plate [14]. The scattering formalism has been successfully exploited [10,[15][16][17][18] in this context.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The enhancement of HT in the near-field regime (generally denoting separations small compared to the thermal wavelength, which is roughly 8 microns at room temperature) has only recently been verified experimentally [5,6]. Theoretically, HT has been considered for a limited number of shapes: Parallel plates [2,3,7,8], a dipole or sphere in front a plate [9][10][11], two dipoles or spheres [9,12,13], and for a cone and a plate [14]. The scattering formalism has been successfully exploited [10,[15][16][17][18] in this context.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) is an expansion in the ratio of separation to radius of curvature of the surface. The coefficient β ω (S) is obtained from the perturbative expansion [8] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been theoretically predicted that NFRHT can be controlled using nanoporous materials, 5 thin films, 6,7 and graphene sheets, [8][9][10][11] or by adjusting the material temperature, 12 surface roughness, 13 and metal-insulator transition. 14 In contrast to a large number of theoretical studies, there exist few experiments that demonstrate the tuning of NFRHT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For structured as well as for rough surfaces (Biehs et al (2010c;d;; ) the LDOS can be calculated pertubatively by using for example the perturbation approach of (Greffet (1988)) if the height differences of the surface profile are the smallest length scales and in particular smaller than the thermal wavelength (Henkel and Sandoghdar (1998)). This allows for comparision of the NSThM data with theory, i.e., with the numerically evaluated LDOS D M (ω th , r tip ).…”
Section: Thermal Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%