2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(01)00035-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of roughness on characteristics of tight interference fit of a shaft and a hub

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 19 shows the scattering of the pull-out force versus the surface roughness. where roughness was found to correlate with bond strength (Yang et al, 2001). Yang et al examined this effect in more detail in a subsequent work, showing that while the roughness can lead to a loss in interference due to the valleys of the rough texture, the plastic deformation of the asperities in the texture can lead to increased contact pressure, and thus an increased bond strength (Yang et al, 2002).…”
Section: Pull-out Force Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 19 shows the scattering of the pull-out force versus the surface roughness. where roughness was found to correlate with bond strength (Yang et al, 2001). Yang et al examined this effect in more detail in a subsequent work, showing that while the roughness can lead to a loss in interference due to the valleys of the rough texture, the plastic deformation of the asperities in the texture can lead to increased contact pressure, and thus an increased bond strength (Yang et al, 2002).…”
Section: Pull-out Force Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach will not predict the stress concentrations at the ends of the joint and nor is it suitable for a bush of changing section (a railway wheel for example). Generally numerical methods, principally finite or boundary element analysis, are used to determine contact stress distribution [3,4,5,6,7]. These methods can be used to predict non-uniform contact pressures at the interface caused by geometry changes and edge stress discontinuities.…”
Section: Interface Pressure Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the ANOVA (Table 4) it is clear that only the linear effects of interference and average undulation number are significant and the higher-order effects and interaction effects are negligible. Earlier investigations [15][16][17][18] observed the influence of the surface roughness of mating surfaces on the load bearing ability of interference-fitted assemblies. However, these investigations did not touch upon the roundness profile in general and the average undulation number in particular.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the pressure is maximum and the orthoradial stress is minimum on the peaks and vice versa on the valleys. Yang et al [18] worked on asperities behaviour at a mating surface; they confirmed that surface roughness has a noticeable influence on joint strength and proposed a new peak-to-peak tightening definition to compute the pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%