1989
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.40.668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of rotation-induced nuclear deformation onα-particle evaporation spectra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
49
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some other authors claim that these spectra may be well explained in terms of a statistical model incorporating only a spin dependent level density and without lowering the emission barriers [10][11][12][13]. Possible deficiencies of an 'average' one step [6,7] or two step decay [12] approximation employed in some statistical model codes were pointed out, as well as the need for proper treatment of level density for expected rotating liquid drop model (RLDM) deformations [5,8,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some other authors claim that these spectra may be well explained in terms of a statistical model incorporating only a spin dependent level density and without lowering the emission barriers [10][11][12][13]. Possible deficiencies of an 'average' one step [6,7] or two step decay [12] approximation employed in some statistical model codes were pointed out, as well as the need for proper treatment of level density for expected rotating liquid drop model (RLDM) deformations [5,8,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several papers reported that these nuclei are subjected to lower emission barriers as compared to inverse absorption channels due to large deformations at these higher excitation energy and angular momentum [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Some other authors claim that these spectra may be well explained in terms of a statistical model incorporating only a spin dependent level density and without lowering the emission barriers [10][11][12][13]. Possible deficiencies of an 'average' one step [6,7] or two step decay [12] approximation employed in some statistical model codes were pointed out, as well as the need for proper treatment of level density for expected rotating liquid drop model (RLDM) deformations [5,8,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore if we propose the independence of α-cluster formation probability on the angle θ, then the α-particles should be emitted mainly at angle θ = 0 • (see also [23,25,30,31,32,33]). A similar effect is wellknown in the case of sub-barrier fusion reactions between spherical and deformed nuclei [34,37].…”
Section: /2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore α-nucleus potential should depend on the angle θ between the direction of α-emission and the axial-symmetry axis of the deformed nucleus. Both the α-decay width and the transmission coefficient for tunnelling through the barrier are strongly dependent on θ [20,22,23,24,25,26,30,31,32,33]. This effect is considered in detail in microscopic models [23,24,25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%