2018
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2017-064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of restorative procedures on endodontically treated premolars: Finite element analysis of a CT-scan based three-dimensional model

Abstract: An endodontically treated tooth with mesial-occlusal-distal (MOD) cavity is often restored with composite resin. Palatal and buccal cusp reduction (MODP, MODPB), and/or fiber-reinforced composite posts (P), are used in an attempt to improve the longevity of the restoration. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of these procedures on von Mises stress values and distribution in dental tissues and restorative materials using finite element analysis. Based on CT scans of an extracted second upper pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, the crown cement layer in the EC models showed a similar maximum strain value as the enamel in the DR models. Hence, it seems that the cement layer “buffered” the strain of enamel under the endocrown, possibly due to the lower elastic modulus compared to both the crown and the enamel, which could lead to better preservation of the enamel tissue during fatigue loading in teeth restored with endocrowns compared to direct restorations 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Actually, the crown cement layer in the EC models showed a similar maximum strain value as the enamel in the DR models. Hence, it seems that the cement layer “buffered” the strain of enamel under the endocrown, possibly due to the lower elastic modulus compared to both the crown and the enamel, which could lead to better preservation of the enamel tissue during fatigue loading in teeth restored with endocrowns compared to direct restorations 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The detailed model generation procedure was described elsewhere 3 , 4 . In brief, there were 42 sections in the z-axis that represented tooth tissues and were transferred to a segmentation software (Amira; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in the DICOM format.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the preparation of an endodontic access cavity increases the possibility of cusp fractures following the cusp deflection during function [ 69 ], which is higher for endodontically treated premolars with MOD preparations [ 70 , 71 ]. In fact, it has been observed how the loss of the marginal walls makes these teeth extremely prone to fracture [ 10 , 28 , 52 ]. For all the above reasons, premolars might hypothetically require fiber posts more often than molars, especially in the presence of MOD cavities [ 5 , 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, on the other hand, an increasing number of papers have been advocating the use of direct composite restorations without any post for ETT [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ], stressing the concept that the purpose of a post should be just to retain the core (whenever required) instead of increasing the intrinsic resistance of the root [ 33 , 34 ]; the introduction of innovative and advanced resin-based restorative materials would probably make such a clinical approach even more reliable. Nowadays, in fact, emerging nanotechnologies and improved nanoscale knowledge allows the characterization and control of materials at the atomic or molecular level on a scale of less than 100 nm [ 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 41.4 GPa (36,37), 46.8 GPa (38), 48.0 GPa (39), 50.0 GPa (40), 60.0 GPa (41), 72.7 GPa (42)(43)(44) 75-100 GPa (45), 77.9 GPa (46)(47)(48), 80.0 GPa (49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56), 82.0 GPa (41), 82.5 GPa (57), 83.0 GPa (58) 84.0 GPa (59)(60)(61)(62)(63)(64), 84.1 GPa (5,46,61,, 85.0 GPa (107), 0.002 (77) 0.2 (75,76,78,85,86,96,97,102), 0.23-0.30 (108), 0.30 (25-27,29,30,32,34-38,40,49-51,53,56,61,62,73,74,79,87,88,93,95,98,99 ,103,109,110), 0.31 (28,52,89,111,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%