1986
DOI: 10.1002/cne.902470411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of reduced neuron pool on the magnitude of naturally occurring motor neuron death

Abstract: The present investigation was undertaken to examine the role of peripheral competition in survival of motor neurons during development. A loss of approximately half of the trochlear motor neurons in duck and quail occurs during the course of normal embryogenesis. The number of motor neurons in the nucleus of quail prior to the onset of cell death is identical to the final number of survivors in the nucleus of duck embryos (about 1,300 neurons). In the present study competition at the peripheral target was decr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing the size of the target rescued some limb-innervating motoneurons from death (Hollyday and Hamburger, 1976;see also O'Brien and Oppenheim, 1990; for thoracic motoneurons), and decreasing the size of the "competing" neuronal population in frog spinal cord (Olek and Edwards, 1978), in a specific chick motoneuron pool ( Lance-Jones and , and in the chick ciliary ganglion (Pilar, Landmesser, and Burstein, 1980), all resulted in increased survival of the remaining neurons. However, because the alteration in neuronal survival often did not quantitatively match that predicted by the most simple version of the numericalmatching hypothesis (Pilar et al, 1980;Tanaka and Landmesser 1986b;Sohal et al, 1986Sohal et al, , 1991, this hypothesis and the importance of the target in neuronal survival has more recently been called into question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the size of the target rescued some limb-innervating motoneurons from death (Hollyday and Hamburger, 1976;see also O'Brien and Oppenheim, 1990; for thoracic motoneurons), and decreasing the size of the "competing" neuronal population in frog spinal cord (Olek and Edwards, 1978), in a specific chick motoneuron pool ( Lance-Jones and , and in the chick ciliary ganglion (Pilar, Landmesser, and Burstein, 1980), all resulted in increased survival of the remaining neurons. However, because the alteration in neuronal survival often did not quantitatively match that predicted by the most simple version of the numericalmatching hypothesis (Pilar et al, 1980;Tanaka and Landmesser 1986b;Sohal et al, 1986Sohal et al, , 1991, this hypothesis and the importance of the target in neuronal survival has more recently been called into question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Lamb ( 1980) observed no difference in the final number of spinal motor neurons when both sides of the spinal cord innervated a single hindlimb in Xenopus. We were also unable to save any additional quail trochlear motor neurons when they innervated the larger target muscle of the duck (Sohal et al, 1986). Similarly, Tanaka and Landmesser ( 1986) reported that no additional quail motor neurons were rescued when quail spinal cord innervated the larger chick limb.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The effect of a larger than normal size target on neuron survival was examined by making the smaller trochlear motor neuron pool of the quail embryo innervate the larger superior oblique muscle of the duck embryo (Sohal et al, 1986). This was accomplished by grafting midbrain, the embry-onic source of trochlear nucleus, of quail in the place of the midbrain of the duck embryo.…”
Section: Motor Neurons Innervating a Large Targetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of our finding that the synapses in chimera embryos develop in a fashion similar to that of the duck it is necessary to discuss the new information at hand with respect to the results on motor neuron survival reported previously. 21 As was pointed out in the introduction, our earlier studies determined that when quail trochlear motor neurons innervated a larger duck superior oblique muscle we were unable to rescue quail cells from natural cell death. The results of this investigation indicate that the afferent synapses for these motor neurons were different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%