2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of red propolis on the physicochemical, microbiological and sensory characteristics of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) salami

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moisture (%w/w) 0 41.3 ± 0.7 a 40.9 ± 0.9 a 41.3 ± 1.0 a 42.9 ± 0.8 a,B 41.7 ± 0.3 a,C 42.4 ± 0.1 a,C 15 40.9 ± 1.0 a 40.5 ± 1.0 a 42.0 ± 1.3 a 42.9 ± 0.8 a,B 41.9 ± 0.2 a,C 42.0 ± 0.3 a,BC 30 40.7 ± 0.7 ab 41.1 ± 0.6 ab 41.9 ± 1.2 b 42.4 ± 0.6 b,B 39.3 ± 0.1 a,B 41.3 ± 0.4 ab,AB 45 40.5 ± 0.4 bc 40.0 ± 0.5 ab 39.9 ± 1.0 ab 40.0 ± 0.4 ab,A 38.4 ± 0.0 a,A 42.1 ± 0.0 c,BC 60 39.9 ± 0.4 ab 40.0 ± 0.3 ab 39.8 ± 1.1 ab 39.6 ± 0.7 ab,A 38.4 ± 0.1 a,A 40.9 ± 0.3 b,A Fat (%w/w) 0 30.8 ± 0.5 a 30.8 ± 1.4 a 30.2 ± 1.8 a 29.4 ± 0.4 a,A 31.0 ± 0.3 a,A 33.5 ± 0.4 b 15 30.1 ± 0.1 ab 30.5 ± 0.5 ab 29.1 ± 1.0 a 30.4 ± 0.5 ab,AB 31.0 ± 0.1 b,A 33.3 ± 0.5 c 30 29.8 ± 0.3 a 28.9 ± 1.3 a 29.7 ± 0.8 a 30.0 ± 0.2 a,A 31.3 ± 0.4 a,A 34.1 ± 0.9 b 45 30.2 ± 0.4 a 32.0 ± 1.6 ab 30.4 ± 0.7 ab 31.5 ± 0.3 ab,B 32.9 ± 0.2 b,B 33.0 ± 0.8 b 60 30.6 ± 0.4 a 30.7 ± 1.0 a 30.7 ± 1.0 a 31.7 ± 0.5 ab,B 33. in the formation of a cloudy viscose solution, which lowers the L* value (Bis-Souza et al, 2020;Mafra et al, 2022). The moisture content of the sample during storage was ranged between 38.35% and 42.91% (Table 2).…”
Section: Sample Groups Daysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moisture (%w/w) 0 41.3 ± 0.7 a 40.9 ± 0.9 a 41.3 ± 1.0 a 42.9 ± 0.8 a,B 41.7 ± 0.3 a,C 42.4 ± 0.1 a,C 15 40.9 ± 1.0 a 40.5 ± 1.0 a 42.0 ± 1.3 a 42.9 ± 0.8 a,B 41.9 ± 0.2 a,C 42.0 ± 0.3 a,BC 30 40.7 ± 0.7 ab 41.1 ± 0.6 ab 41.9 ± 1.2 b 42.4 ± 0.6 b,B 39.3 ± 0.1 a,B 41.3 ± 0.4 ab,AB 45 40.5 ± 0.4 bc 40.0 ± 0.5 ab 39.9 ± 1.0 ab 40.0 ± 0.4 ab,A 38.4 ± 0.0 a,A 42.1 ± 0.0 c,BC 60 39.9 ± 0.4 ab 40.0 ± 0.3 ab 39.8 ± 1.1 ab 39.6 ± 0.7 ab,A 38.4 ± 0.1 a,A 40.9 ± 0.3 b,A Fat (%w/w) 0 30.8 ± 0.5 a 30.8 ± 1.4 a 30.2 ± 1.8 a 29.4 ± 0.4 a,A 31.0 ± 0.3 a,A 33.5 ± 0.4 b 15 30.1 ± 0.1 ab 30.5 ± 0.5 ab 29.1 ± 1.0 a 30.4 ± 0.5 ab,AB 31.0 ± 0.1 b,A 33.3 ± 0.5 c 30 29.8 ± 0.3 a 28.9 ± 1.3 a 29.7 ± 0.8 a 30.0 ± 0.2 a,A 31.3 ± 0.4 a,A 34.1 ± 0.9 b 45 30.2 ± 0.4 a 32.0 ± 1.6 ab 30.4 ± 0.7 ab 31.5 ± 0.3 ab,B 32.9 ± 0.2 b,B 33.0 ± 0.8 b 60 30.6 ± 0.4 a 30.7 ± 1.0 a 30.7 ± 1.0 a 31.7 ± 0.5 ab,B 33. in the formation of a cloudy viscose solution, which lowers the L* value (Bis-Souza et al, 2020;Mafra et al, 2022). The moisture content of the sample during storage was ranged between 38.35% and 42.91% (Table 2).…”
Section: Sample Groups Daysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Chemical composition of propolis [11] Table 1 Compounds identified in propolis extract by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry RT, retention time (minutes); KI, calculated Kovats index. Relative area (%): corresponds to the relative area of the identified metabolites [12] vegetables, fruits, eggs, and meat by Bankova et al [23]. A growing interest in employing propolis for packaging methods planned to keep products fresh and optimize their shelf life has increased [24].…”
Section: Food Packaging Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 shows some phenolic compounds identified in propolis extract by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [12]. However, a recent study showed that it contains more than 300 constituents.…”
Section: Introduction To Propolismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) BI = 100(X − 0.31) ∕ 0.17 et al, 2007;Najafpour Darzi et al, 2019). The origin of propolis, the extraction method, and the type of solvent used for extraction influence propolis extract characterization (Mafra et al, 2022).…”
Section: Characterization Of Ethanolic Propolis Extractmentioning
confidence: 99%