2018
DOI: 10.1002/er.4294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of reactors, microbial carbohydrate uptake, and metabolic pathways on ethanol production from grass biomass: A review

Abstract: Summary Grasses are considered to be potential lignocellulosic feedstock for renewable and sustainable biofuels such as bioethanol. However, the process involved, ie, pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification, and fermentation in conversion of these lignocellulosic biomass to bioethanol, remains expensive and at present is not affordable for industrial production. Thus, the present review assesses the influence of the recent technologies that can be employed for the bio‐refinery based pretreatment and enzymatic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the addition of 1% TA significantly reduced fermentation efficiency for all strains (B5-1: 74.81%, B5-2: 83.79%, C6-3: 84.39%, and SC-5088: 83.75%), with efficiency remaining in the range of 54.03% to 49.92% when using isolated strains B5-2 and C6-3. These findings indicate that tannins interfere with yeast metabolism and ethanol production through multiple mechanisms, including exerting toxic effects on yeast cells, chelating essential metal ions, disrupting sugar uptake, and ultimately reducing the efficiency of the fermentation process [38,39]. The extent of these effects varies depending on the concentration of tannins in the The efficacy and productivity of ethanol production by four S. cerevisiae strains (B5-1, B5-2, C6-3, and SC-5088) were evaluated for their glucose consumption and ethanol production abilities with varying TA concentrations.…”
Section: Glucose Consumption and Ethanol Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the addition of 1% TA significantly reduced fermentation efficiency for all strains (B5-1: 74.81%, B5-2: 83.79%, C6-3: 84.39%, and SC-5088: 83.75%), with efficiency remaining in the range of 54.03% to 49.92% when using isolated strains B5-2 and C6-3. These findings indicate that tannins interfere with yeast metabolism and ethanol production through multiple mechanisms, including exerting toxic effects on yeast cells, chelating essential metal ions, disrupting sugar uptake, and ultimately reducing the efficiency of the fermentation process [38,39]. The extent of these effects varies depending on the concentration of tannins in the The efficacy and productivity of ethanol production by four S. cerevisiae strains (B5-1, B5-2, C6-3, and SC-5088) were evaluated for their glucose consumption and ethanol production abilities with varying TA concentrations.…”
Section: Glucose Consumption and Ethanol Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the intracellular processing of these mobilised carbohydrates by specific enzymes is required for their metabolic utilisation. Although the metabolic routes for carbohydrate uptake and consumption have been described for model yeasts such as S. cerevisiae and Pichia pastoris, no equivalent data are available for C. oleaginosus [19][20][21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%