Men are men because of testosterone, and the effects of this hormone are evident in virtually every organ or tissue in a normal adult man. Because testosterone is a classical endocrine hormone with effects throughout the body, many endocrinologists will have failed to realize that, in terms of its effects on fertility, the primary role of testosterone is not endocrine but paracrine, as it is the local action of testosterone on spermatogenesis which determines fertility. When looked at from this perspective it is logical to question the traditional endocrine teaching which states that testosterone secretion is controlled solely by pituitary luteinizing hormone (LH). Certainly, the levels of testosterone and LH in peripheral blood show a close relationship, but it is not the level of testosterone in peripheral blood which determines fertility. If the primary role of testosterone is within the testis, then it is not unreasonable to expect that local mechanisms may exist to regulate the intratesticular levels of this steroid. The object of this review is to examinecritically the evidence for such mechanisms, their possible nature and their physiological and clinical significance (if any).Before reviewing the data on intratesticular control of steroidogenesis it is essential to place it in perspective. To do this, three principal questions need to be answered: ( I ) Why might intratesticular mechanisms for local control of testosterone production be required? (2) What is the role (or roles) of testosterone within the testis? A proper understanding of how testosterone controls spermatogenesis is essential if the local regulation of testosterone production is to be evaluated from a physiological perspective. ( 3 ) What are the constraints or problems relating to studies on the intratesticular control of steroidogenesis? It is essential to understand the potential limitations of studies on this subject so that a reasoned interpretation of the results can be made. Most relevant data is derived from studies in uitro, and the relationship of such data to the situation in uivo is often difficult to establish.
W H Y M I G H T INTRATESTICULAR M E C H A N I S M S F O R T H E C O N T R O L OF TESTOSTERONE P R O D U C T I O N BE REQUIRED?It can be argued that paracrine control of testicular testosterone production is irrelevant, because (a) the serum levels of LH and testosterone clearly change together (i.e. they control each other) and (b) the removal of LH in animals by hypophysectomy or immunoneutralization lowers intratesticular testosterone levels so drastically that 787