2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of prosthetic humeral head size and medial offset on the mechanics of the shoulder with cuff tear arthropathy: A numerical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Predictive capabilities of computational MS models are, therefore, being considered to gain dynamic and objective information on the condition of individual patients [9]. This, in turn, would aid the formulation of quantitative and patient-specific indications for an optimal treatment [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Such an approach can potentially overcome the limitations of current practice, in which treatments are based on subjective, static, and mostly qualitative assessment [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictive capabilities of computational MS models are, therefore, being considered to gain dynamic and objective information on the condition of individual patients [9]. This, in turn, would aid the formulation of quantitative and patient-specific indications for an optimal treatment [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Such an approach can potentially overcome the limitations of current practice, in which treatments are based on subjective, static, and mostly qualitative assessment [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the previous 3D anatomic shoulder musculoskeletal models address GH loading in the light of rotator cuff tears ( Holscher et al, 2016 ; Klemt et al, 2018 ; Vidt et al, 2018 ), and these outcomes can be transferable to ATSA. Lemieux et al (2013) and De Wilde et al (2004) predicted the GH force and deltoid force of ATSA using musculoskeletal models. Moreover, Sins et al (2015) introduced successfully the adapted musculoskeletal model of the non-conforming shoulder joint for quantifying joint force and kinematics using the force-dependent kinematics (FDK) method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, several studies have used finite element analysis (FEA) to evaluate the labrum effect over capsular strain distribution [20][21][22]. Moreover, some authors have developed kinetic models of the shoulder to evaluate the instability lesions from the labrum without a capsule, studying the influence of geometrical parameters of the humeral head on the mechanics of cuff tear arthropathy [23,24]. However, no studies have assessed the effect of an Isolated Type II SLAP lesion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%