Influence of Projectile Nose Shape on Ballistic Limit and Damage to Glass/Vinyl Ester Composite Plates

Abstract

In the recent past, the substantial structural strength, light weight and stiffness properties of polymer based composite materials find its application in aircraft and automotive structures at prodigious rate. Fibre glass Reinforced Plastic (FRP) composites are partially elastic and brittle. The present study evaluates the ballistic limit, energy absorbed and the damage area caused by different projectile nose shapes on the composite plates made of glass fibre and vinyl ester resin with the orientation of (0/90)s. The number of plies in the plates is varied to 4, 6 and 8 and thus lead to different thicknesses. The projectile nose geometry is varied (hemispherical, conical, truncated conical, ogival and truncated ogival) to have realistic effect on the impact. The influence of projectile nose shape over ballistic limit is found experimentally and compared with the analytical predictions by H. M. Wen [5,6]. The ballistic limit, perforation mechanism, energy absorption at ballistic limit and the damage area at ballistic limit velocity has been studied. The influence of thickness of the composite plate over the ballistic limit have also been discussed. It is found that the truncated conical nose shaped projectile resulted in highest ballistic limit and largest damage area dominated by delamination. Experimental results showed that the analytical method [5,6] could satisfactorily predict the ballistic limit.

Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Projectile Nose Shape on the Deformation and Energy Dissipation Mechanisms of the Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) Composite

“…For the blunt nose projectile penetration, the primary deformation features consisted of the shear plugging and tensile deformation. Moreover, Ulven [ 14 ], Jordan [ 16 ], and Sasikumar [ 23 ] found that there was a high deviation between the predicted ballistic limit velocity and the experimental values, and they simultaneously pointed out that the accuracy of the analytical model was depended on the failure modes of the composite. The current analytical model was more suitable for the composites with local and shear failure mode damage [ 24 ].…”