1987
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910400502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of pregnancy and lactation on serum and breast fluid estrogen levels: Implications for breast cancer risk

Abstract: We investigated estrogen (estrone and estradiol) levels in serum and in nipple aspirates of breast fluid in relation to reproductive and menopausal characteristics in 104 normal women. In general, breast fluid and serum estrogen levels were not correlated and breast fluid estrogen levels were approximately 5 to 45 times higher than serum levels. Serum estrogen levels were lower in post-menopausal than in pre-menopausal women. In contrast, breast fluid estrogen levels were approximately the same in pre- and pos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
67
1
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
67
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several investigations have suggested that women with extensive breastfeeding histories may be at reduced endometrial cancer risk (Rosenblatt and Thomas, 1995;Salazar-Martinez et al, 1999;Newcomb and Trentham-Dietz, 2000;Wernli et al, 2006), possibly from suppression of ovarian hormones (Petrakis et al, 1987). Although we initially observed reduced risk among subjects who breastfed for 2 or more years, this relation disappeared after adjustment for other risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 38%
“…Several investigations have suggested that women with extensive breastfeeding histories may be at reduced endometrial cancer risk (Rosenblatt and Thomas, 1995;Salazar-Martinez et al, 1999;Newcomb and Trentham-Dietz, 2000;Wernli et al, 2006), possibly from suppression of ovarian hormones (Petrakis et al, 1987). Although we initially observed reduced risk among subjects who breastfed for 2 or more years, this relation disappeared after adjustment for other risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 38%
“…A prolonged period of lactation is associated with a longer period of lactational amenorrhoea and thus exposure to total estrogens, which has been related to proliferative and carcinogenic effects, is reduced 24 ; breast fluid estrogen levels, independent of serum estrogen levels, were found to be lower in breastfeeding premenopausal women compared with never lactated (parous or nulliparous), and it took several years after the last breastfeeding to reach levels found in nulliparous women 25 ; in lactating women, oxytocin causes contraction of myoepithelial cells in response to suction, and it was reported that oxytocin inhibits cell proliferation and tumor growth in animal models, although this latter mechanism would be relevant mainly for short-term risk. 26 In conclusion, this is the largest case-control study on breast cancer to date in India; it revealed a strongly decreased risk for breast cancer in premenopausal women with long duration of breastfeeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lactation has also been proposed to protect against breast cancer through hormonal mechanisms by postponing the resumption of ovulatory menstrual cycles after a pregnancy, by increasing the differentiation of breast tissue (Russo and Russo, 1994) or by altering oestrogen levels in the breast (Petrakis et al, 1987). In addition, it has been proposed that lactation also has a direct mechanical effect by which carcinogenic agents are excreted from the breast ductal tissue (Murrell, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protective effects of lactation may occur because of both hormonal (Petrakis et al, 1987;Russo and Russo, 1994) and nonhormonal mechanisms (Murrell, 1991). It has previously been proposed that hormonal breast cancer risk factors ought to be predominantly associated with tumours that express oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors, and less so with receptor-negative tumours (McTiernan et al, 1986;Stanford et al, 1987;Potter et al, 1995;Enger et al, 2000;Ursin et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%