2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of porosity on ultrasonic wave velocity, attenuation and interlaminar interface echoes in composite laminates: Finite element simulations and measurements

Abstract: The influence of porosity on the ultrasonic wave propagation in unidirectional carbon-fiber-reinforced composite laminates is investigated based on the two-dimensional finite element analysis and measurements. Random distributions of pores with different contents and size are considered in the analysis, together with the effects of viscoelastic plies and interlaminar resin-rich regions. The transient reflection waveforms are calculated from the frequency-domain finite-element solutions by the inverse Fourier t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the temporal reflection waveforms, this can be observed as persistent echoes from the interlaminar interfaces. 10 In assessing the structural integrity of composite laminate structures, the quality of interlaminar interfaces is of equal or higher importance compared to the mechanical properties of plies themselves. In recent investigations, a method has been proposed [11][12][13][14][15] to evaluate the equivalent stiffnesses of interlaminar interfaces of composite laminates based on the reflection or transmission spectra of ultrasonic waves in the frequency range where the wavelength is comparable to the double ply thickness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the temporal reflection waveforms, this can be observed as persistent echoes from the interlaminar interfaces. 10 In assessing the structural integrity of composite laminate structures, the quality of interlaminar interfaces is of equal or higher importance compared to the mechanical properties of plies themselves. In recent investigations, a method has been proposed [11][12][13][14][15] to evaluate the equivalent stiffnesses of interlaminar interfaces of composite laminates based on the reflection or transmission spectra of ultrasonic waves in the frequency range where the wavelength is comparable to the double ply thickness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it has been shown that the porosity content in the laminate can be evaluated from the characteristics of interlaminar interface echoes in the frequency range of bandgap. 10 These studies highlight the importance of gaining fundamental understanding of the ultrasonic bandgap features of composite laminates in order to utilize them for nondestructive materials characterization. In the above studies, [10][11][12][13][14][15] however, conventional carbon fiber-reinforced composite laminates were used for experimental observations, whose interlaminar resin regions were so thin (only a few microns) that the interlaminar scattering was very weak.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, internal defects such as voids can be introduced due to the fabrication process of the composite material. In previous studies conducted by Stone and Clarke [23], Ishii et al [24], and Lin et al [25], voids were confirmed to disrupt the propagation of ultrasonic waves and increase scattering and absorption. In addition, Lee et al [13] observed that a void content of 5% in GFRP hull plates considerably reduced the ultrasonic pulseecho velocity.…”
Section: Ultrasonic Testing Of Composite Materialsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For thermoplastics, the voids generated during the laying process are the final defects due to the in-situ curing technique. For thermosetting plastics, the defects before curing can significantly affect the formation of voids after curing [ 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 ]. Their formation mechanisms are entirely different from the positional defects.…”
Section: Void Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%