2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2003.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of polymer adsorption and conformation on flocculation and dewatering of kaolin suspension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, coverage of particles was comparably lower in the case of AS#1. It is known that complete coverage of surfaces with polymers adsorbed with flat configuration would lead to steric repulsion resulting in stable suspensions (Besra et al 2004). Our SEM data indicate that the lower performance of AS#4 compared to AS#1 could result from a higher or even full coverage of suspended particle surfaces by this.…”
Section: Characterization Of Flocs Using Semmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…On the other hand, coverage of particles was comparably lower in the case of AS#1. It is known that complete coverage of surfaces with polymers adsorbed with flat configuration would lead to steric repulsion resulting in stable suspensions (Besra et al 2004). Our SEM data indicate that the lower performance of AS#4 compared to AS#1 could result from a higher or even full coverage of suspended particle surfaces by this.…”
Section: Characterization Of Flocs Using Semmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The isoelectric point of the kaolin in the present investigation is found to lie in pH 2.5 and is about 0.3 units higher than the reported values. 18 At pH < 2.5, kaolin particles display a net positive zeta potential due to the protonation of the surface of kaolin. At pH > 2.5, kaolin particles display a net negative zeta potential due to the deprotonation of the surface.…”
Section: Effect Of Flocculant Dosage and Ds On Flocculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] On the other hand, an increase in charge density causes an increase in electrostatic repulsive forces between the anionic polymer and negatively charged gibbsite particles at pH 11.5. Increase in repulsion apparently affects the flocculation of positively or negatively charged particles by enhancing the bridging forces leading to high settling rates or by making attachment of the particle to the polymer difficult, respectively.…”
Section: Particle Interactions: Rheologymentioning
confidence: 99%