2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0964-8305(02)00055-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of polymer addition on biogenic sulfuric acid attack of concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In tanks with biodegradable material, the pH was as low as 5.5. Vincke, et al (2002) studied the influence of different additives on the hydrogen sulphide oxidation and sulphuric acid production. In their study, in laboratory scale experiments, the pH decreased from 8 to 1 in microbially active systems.…”
Section: Low and Intermediate Radioactive Waste Repositoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tanks with biodegradable material, the pH was as low as 5.5. Vincke, et al (2002) studied the influence of different additives on the hydrogen sulphide oxidation and sulphuric acid production. In their study, in laboratory scale experiments, the pH decreased from 8 to 1 in microbially active systems.…”
Section: Low and Intermediate Radioactive Waste Repositoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dissolution effect of the hydrogen ion and the separate effect of the sulfate ion combine to create an aggressive set of chemical reactions, threatening the stability of a cement matrix. Debate exists however regarding the mechanisms behind chemical and biological sulfuric acid attacks, and resistance to the former does not necessarily result in resistance to the latter [4,9,48]. Explanations centre on the involvement of the sulfuric acid producing bacteria Thiobacillus where Monteny et al [4] claim that it is the moist conditions in the gypsum corrosion front that constitute an excellent breeding ground for the bacteria to thrive.…”
Section: Attack Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments exposing 100mm Portland cement concrete cubes with a binder of 35% ordinary Portland cement (OPC) / 65% GGBS to an H 2 SO 4 solution for five months, as described in BRE Digest 363 [54], reported higher performance than for binders of 100% sulfate resisting Portland cement (SRPC) or 75% OPC / 25% PFA [28]. This improved performance of concrete in acidic conditions has been attributed to either lower porosity, lower levels of calcium hydroxide or both [4,45,48] while Saricimen et al [54] determined that in a 3% flowing H 2 SO 4 solution neither SRPC nor OPC showed any difference in resisting attack, a conclusion supported by [7]. Monteny et al [39] suggest that a refined pore structure will increase the capillary action of the cement matrix and act as a mechanism for the aggressive solution to find its way deeper into the concrete.…”
Section: Types Of Sulfuric Acid Attackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vincke et al [31] have especially shown that the addition of acrylic and styrene-butadiene modify the porous network by influencing the paste-aggregates transition zone and by clogging the microscracks. The EPS 180 admixture seems then also to modify the transfers inside the cement paste porous network and the EPS 180 coatings at the cement paste samples surface (painted or sprayed) control the water absorption.…”
Section: Capillary Imbibitions Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Means to improve the resistance against penetration of aggressive elements in concrete are to decrease its porosity or to modify its geometry by incorporating polymers in its formulation [30,31]. When corrosion inhibitors are applied on the surface of concrete, the protection against corrosion is more often due to the reduction of penetration towards the concrete of aggressive elements present in the water than to a direct inhibiting action on the rebars surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%