2015
DOI: 10.1002/2015gc005996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of plate tectonic mode on the coupled thermochemical evolution of Earth's mantle and core

Abstract: We investigate the influence of tectonic mode on the thermochemical evolution of simulated mantle convection coupled to a parameterized core cooling model. The tectonic mode is controlled by varying the friction coefficient for brittle behavior, producing the three tectonic modes: mobile lid (plate tectonics), stagnant lid, and episodic lid. The resulting compositional structure of the deep mantle is strongly dependent on tectonic mode, with episodic lid resulting in a thick layer of subducted basalt in the de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(98 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the years, numerical simulations run using different codes and employing different degrees of complexity have provided consistent results: In general, when a viscoplastic, strongly temperature‐dependent rheology is used, three convective regimes with different surface expressions are found. These are mobile lid for low yield stresses, episodic lid for intermediate yield stresses, and stagnant lid for high yield stresses (Lourenço et al, ; Moresi & Solomatov, ; Nakagawa & Tackley, ; O'Neill et al, ; Tackley, ). Figure shows the mantle final thermal and compositional states of one example of these regimes, obtained through the simulations run in the present study (Figure c depicts a new regime described later in this work).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the years, numerical simulations run using different codes and employing different degrees of complexity have provided consistent results: In general, when a viscoplastic, strongly temperature‐dependent rheology is used, three convective regimes with different surface expressions are found. These are mobile lid for low yield stresses, episodic lid for intermediate yield stresses, and stagnant lid for high yield stresses (Lourenço et al, ; Moresi & Solomatov, ; Nakagawa & Tackley, ; O'Neill et al, ; Tackley, ). Figure shows the mantle final thermal and compositional states of one example of these regimes, obtained through the simulations run in the present study (Figure c depicts a new regime described later in this work).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shows that an enriched mantle (Figure c) is more efficient at cooling the mantle than a depleted mantle (Figures b and d) (cf. Bédard, ; Nakagawa & Tackley, ). Figure shows an overview of how basaltic material is distributed in the mantle by the end of the simulations performed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the dry mantle, pulse-like profiles are found in the surface heat flow and surface mobility charts for the first several 100 Myr, followed by near-zero mobility, which indicates a nearly "stagnant lid" convection. For the hydrous mantle, the surface heat flow is higher than that of the dry mantle by a factor of 2, and surface mobility indicates nearly stable plate motion that would suitably explain the style of surface tectonic motion on the Earth (e.g., Nakagawa & Tackley, 2015). Figure 3 shows the thermo-chemical-viscous-hydrous structure in the mantle 4.6 Gyr after the initial conditions with friction coefficients of 0.1 (Figure 3, left), 0.175 (Figure 3, middle), and 0.3 (Figure 3, right).…”
Section: Dry Versus Hydrous Mantlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core contained 50 ppm of potassium (e.g., Hirose et al, ) and precipitated light elements at a rate of ~10 19 kg/K or 5 × 10 −6 K −1 normalized to the mass of the core (e.g., Badro et al, ; O'Rourke & Stevenson, ). Finally, Q BMO decreased linearly from 55 TW at the start to 15 TW at present, which approximates the cooling history obtained using boundary layer models (e.g., Blanc et al, ; Labrosse et al, ; Ziegler & Stegman, ) and dynamical simulations (e.g., Nakagawa & Tackley, , ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%