DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180813-4584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of plant population levels on the correlation among agronomic characters of S2 lines of maize and of their testcrosses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(2 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kernel depth generally decreased with the increase of plant density as reported by Ortiz-Cereceres (1967).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturesupporting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Kernel depth generally decreased with the increase of plant density as reported by Ortiz-Cereceres (1967).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Shelling percentage was not much affected by densities of planting as reported by Bryan, Eckhardt and Sprague (1940), Omar (1958), Stickler and Lande (1960), El-Rouby, El-Khishen and Aboul-Ela (1961), and El-Lakany (1965). On the other hand, Hemingway (1957) and Ortiz-Cereceres (1967) reported that shelling percentage decreased as plant population levels increased and the latter reported a highly significant difference (p = 0.01) for shelling percentage when the stand level changed from 16,000 to 24,000 plants per acre.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The plant density at which the plateau occurs is a function of the amount of stress and genotype. Besides affecting yields, plant density also affects other plant characters like plant height, ear height, number of ears per plant, ear size and weight, and the silking to pollen shedding interval as pointed out by Wolf and Howard (1957), Colville and McGill (1952), Ortiz-Cereceras (1967), andEl-Lakany andRussell (1971). A trend for increased plant and ear height as plant density increases was reported by Zuber and Grogan (1956), Zuber et al (1960), and Rutger and Crowder (1967), On the other hand, Dungan et al (1958), Norden (1951), andWarren (1963) stated that the number of ears per plant, ear length, and -weight decreased as plant density increased.…”
Section: Plant Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%