2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Placement of a Nutrition Logo on Cafeteria Menu Items on Lunchtime Food Choices at Dutch Work Sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The detailed background of the label has been described elsewhere (Dötsch-Klerk and Jansen, 2008;Vyth et al, 2009). We found that health-motivated consumers not only reported purchasing but also actually purchased more labeled products (Vyth et al, 2009(Vyth et al, , 2010b, although our randomized controlled trial in worksite cafeterias did not show an effect of labeling on lunchtime food purchases (Vyth et al, 2011). We also found that the label has caused food manufacturers to reformulate existing products and to develop new products with a healthier nutrient composition (Vyth et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The detailed background of the label has been described elsewhere (Dötsch-Klerk and Jansen, 2008;Vyth et al, 2009). We found that health-motivated consumers not only reported purchasing but also actually purchased more labeled products (Vyth et al, 2009(Vyth et al, , 2010b, although our randomized controlled trial in worksite cafeterias did not show an effect of labeling on lunchtime food purchases (Vyth et al, 2011). We also found that the label has caused food manufacturers to reformulate existing products and to develop new products with a healthier nutrient composition (Vyth et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…A study in a cafeteria environment in the Netherlands concluded that the Choices International Foundation health logo did not result in a significant increase of sales of more healthful lunchtime foods (Vyth et al, 2011). Similarly a study on the introduction of TL labelling in a UK retailer (Sacks et al, 2009) showed no impact on the healthfulness of food purchases in the first four weeks of the FoP labelling being introduced, although this study outcome may have been limited by the small range of food categories included.…”
Section: Prevalent Front-of-pack Labelling Schemes and Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The latter used a fake food buffet, 13 a Foodscape Laboratory 26 and an online shelf-display. 27 In the field studies, different settings were involved, including dining facilities or cafeterias in schools (11), cafeterias in hospitals (2) as well as restaurants, buffet lines at conferences (2; 28,29 ), a cafeteria at a workplace, 30 a university, 31 a train station, 32 corner stores 33 and a swimming pool. 34 Most studies used a within subjects pre-post interventions design (10), or a between subjects design with a control and treatment group (9), while a minority used both a between-and within subjects design (4).…”
Section: Narrative Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%