2021
DOI: 10.3390/photonics8060194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Pixel Etching on Electrical and Electro-Optical Performances of a Ga-Free InAs/InAsSb T2SL Barrier Photodetector for Mid-Wave Infrared Imaging

Abstract: In this paper, the influence of etching depth on the dark current and photo-response of a mid-wave infrared Ga-free T2SL XBn pixel detector is investigated. Two wet chemical etching depths have been considered for the fabrication of a non-passivated individual pixel detector having a cut-off wavelength of 5 µm at 150 K. This study shows the strong influence of the lateral diffusion length of a shallow-etched pixel on the electro-optical properties of the device. The lowest dark current density was recorded for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the temperature range 110K-150K, the GR regime is identified which indicates that a depletion region is formed at the absorber-barrier interface and extends into the absorber, since it is the less targeted doped region between the two. 12 The -0.4V dark current density at 150K is 4.5 × 10 5 A/cm 2 which is approximately 10 times the Rule07. 21 Figure 5 shows the experimental QE of the device in temperature range [90K-220K] and under two applied biases V = −0.2V & −0.4V .…”
Section: Dark Current and Photoresponse Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In the temperature range 110K-150K, the GR regime is identified which indicates that a depletion region is formed at the absorber-barrier interface and extends into the absorber, since it is the less targeted doped region between the two. 12 The -0.4V dark current density at 150K is 4.5 × 10 5 A/cm 2 which is approximately 10 times the Rule07. 21 Figure 5 shows the experimental QE of the device in temperature range [90K-220K] and under two applied biases V = −0.2V & −0.4V .…”
Section: Dark Current and Photoresponse Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The strong surface degradation observed in n-on-p devices is attributed to that the p-n junction is being more exposed during the etching process compared to p-on-n devices when the barrier is positioned below the absorber [19][20][21]. This makes the fabrication of detectors with n-onp polarities (with p-type absorbers) challenging.…”
Section: Dark Current Analysis In P-on-n and N-on-p Deepetch Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, by design, the p-n junction of the photodiodes can be placed on the top of the absorber. In this configuration, the diodes can be isolated by a shallow mesa etch [21,22], which minimizes the surface exposed. Planar-or shallow-etched detectors reduce the surface leakage and do not compromise the active area fill factor; however, the lateral transport of carriers can result in electrical cross talk between pixels [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MIR photodetectors find considerable technological importance in medical diagnostics, IR imaging, environmental monitoring and chemical sensing [3][4][5][6]. Recently, InAsSb-based detector technology has been extended to the development of photodiodes with a variety of configurations such as n-i-p structure [3,4] or to the XBn barrier structures [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%