2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpp.2017.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of physiological stress on the presence of hypoplasia and fluctuating asymmetry in a medieval population from the village of Sypniewo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are inconsistent with previous research studying enamel defects and FA, which found no significant relationship between the two (e.g., Gawlikowska-Sroka et al, 2017;Hoover & Matsumura, 2008;Jung et al, 2016;Palubeckaité & Jankauskas, 2001). Previous results have often been interpreted to mean that these stress indicators capture unrelated acute and chronic stresses.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are inconsistent with previous research studying enamel defects and FA, which found no significant relationship between the two (e.g., Gawlikowska-Sroka et al, 2017;Hoover & Matsumura, 2008;Jung et al, 2016;Palubeckaité & Jankauskas, 2001). Previous results have often been interpreted to mean that these stress indicators capture unrelated acute and chronic stresses.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the fetal collection was confirmed in numerous previously published scientific studies (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). The scientific experience of the team has been confirmed in many works using anatomical scientific methodology and anatomical techniques used for statistical analysis (34)(35)(36).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Even so, while the developmental growth data published by Reid and Dean (, ) are increasingly being utilized in studies to estimate the chronology of LEH defects (e.g., Berbesque & Hoover, ; Cares Henriquez & Oxenham, ; Gamble, Boldsen, & Hoppa, ; Miszkiewicz, ; Novak et al, ; Smith, Kurtenbach, & Vermaat, ; Temple, Nakatsukasa, & McGroarty, ; Tomczyk, Tomczyk‐Gruca, & Zalewska, ; Trinkaus, Mednikova, & Dobrovolskaya, ), others continue to use the linear distance‐based regression method (e.g., Krenz‐Niedbala, ; Krenz‐Niedbała & Kozłowski, ; Smith et al, ), or other iterations constructed from the original standards (e.g., D'Anastasio et al, ; Gawlikowska‐Sroka, Dabrowski, Szczurowski, Dzieciolowska‐Baran, & Staniowski, ).…”
Section: Current Methods For Estimating Chronologymentioning
confidence: 99%