2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12039-019-1704-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of periodic table in designing solid-state metal chalcogenides for thermoelectric energy conversion

Abstract: With the apparent burgeoning energy crisis, alternative sources of energies are in a greater need for a sustainable future. Thermoelectrics which can convert waste heat arising from industries, power plants and automobiles into a usable form, electricity; have the potential to be a game-changer in this critical energy shortage. The efficiency of thermoelectric materials which is given by the figure of merit is tricky to manipulate due to the complicated interrelationships of its parameters. But with proper und… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distortion is favored when the stabilization from the s/p mixing offsets the reduced electrostatic stabilization from the lower coordination number. The relative energy difference between the Bi 6 s and S 3 p orbitals is the smallest, resulting in a stronger interaction, and Bi 2 S 3 therefore preferentially adopts the low-symmetry Pnma phase with an active lone pair and remains stable even under pressure. , On the other hand, the poorer energy match between the Bi 6 s and Se 4 p /Te 5 p orbitals leads to weaker interactions that cannot stabilize an active lone pair, resulting in “quenching” and a preference for the higher-symmetry R 3̅ m phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distortion is favored when the stabilization from the s/p mixing offsets the reduced electrostatic stabilization from the lower coordination number. The relative energy difference between the Bi 6 s and S 3 p orbitals is the smallest, resulting in a stronger interaction, and Bi 2 S 3 therefore preferentially adopts the low-symmetry Pnma phase with an active lone pair and remains stable even under pressure. , On the other hand, the poorer energy match between the Bi 6 s and Se 4 p /Te 5 p orbitals leads to weaker interactions that cannot stabilize an active lone pair, resulting in “quenching” and a preference for the higher-symmetry R 3̅ m phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the poorer energy match between the Bi 6s and Se 4p/Te 5p leads to weaker orbital interactions that are insufficient to stabilize an active lone pair, resulting in "quenching". 66 Bi2Se3 and Bi2Te3 therefore preferentially adopt the higher-symmetry R3 ̅ m phase. relatively high energies, we therefore conclude that these phases are highly unlikely to be formed under ambient conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which are met by the binary/ternary/multinary phases of the elements from the p-block of the periodic table. 424 To move the existing frontiers in thermoelectrics, we call for a conceptual advancement by deviating from the conventional approaches and look for new theories or approaches that can decouple the electrical and thermal transport so that they can be independently optimized. This would also lead to novel thermoelectric compounds.…”
Section: Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%