2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05980-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of path curvature on collision avoidance behaviour between two walkers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the man-machine relative distance, relative motion direction, relative position, and relative speed factors in the shared space environment, adopts empirical method and heuristic method to divide the behavior of human (or interfering body) into four typical types [29]: crossing pattern, encountering pattern, leading pattern and confronting pattern. According to different typical behavior patterns, the robot follows the corresponding rules to ensure safety and does not invade sensitive areas.…”
Section: Behavioral Pattern Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the man-machine relative distance, relative motion direction, relative position, and relative speed factors in the shared space environment, adopts empirical method and heuristic method to divide the behavior of human (or interfering body) into four typical types [29]: crossing pattern, encountering pattern, leading pattern and confronting pattern. According to different typical behavior patterns, the robot follows the corresponding rules to ensure safety and does not invade sensitive areas.…”
Section: Behavioral Pattern Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a real AMR as the obstacle and recruited human participants living in an area under the left-sided traffic rule. We expected that using a physical AMR would realistically elicit human behavior similar to the actual situation without limiting the field of view often associated with virtual reality [3,8,9,20,21]. Specifically, we ran an experiment to verify how humans avoid the AMR approaching from five directions, including head-on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a previous study discussed the techniques used by humans to avoid such dynamic obstacles approaching from an orthogonal direction (Basili et al, 2013; Olivier et al, 2013) and crossing paths (Bühler & Lamontagne, 2019; Souza Silva et al, 2018). In addition, several studies have replicated these real-world paradigms in virtual reality (Bühler & Lamontagne, 2019; Hackney et al, 2020; Lynch et al, 2018, 2021; Souza Silva et al, 2018) because the complete evasion of a possible physical collision and an increase in the number of variables of the experiment (such as adding human walkers in the environment) are beneficial for the participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social power model5.1.2 Behavioral pattern analysisAccording to the man-machine relative distance, relative motion direction, relative position and relative speed factors in the shared space environment, adopts empirical method andheuristic method to divide the behavior of human (or interfering body) into four types[28]: crossing, encountering, leading and confronting typical mode. According different typical behavior patterns, the robot follows the corresponding rules to ensure safety and does not invade sensitive areas.1) Crossing behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%