2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-009-9352-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of patch and landscape characteristics on the distribution of the subterranean rodent Ctenomys porteousi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In each locality, all individuals were captured in a period of 3-4 days. All sample localities consisted of a discrete habitat patch located in areas with sandy and friable soils with little plant cover (for a better description of the habitat see Mapelli and Kittlein 2009). …”
Section: Sample Collection Dna Extraction and Microsatellite Amplifimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In each locality, all individuals were captured in a period of 3-4 days. All sample localities consisted of a discrete habitat patch located in areas with sandy and friable soils with little plant cover (for a better description of the habitat see Mapelli and Kittlein 2009). …”
Section: Sample Collection Dna Extraction and Microsatellite Amplifimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suitable habitat of C. porteousi was estimated in only 509 km 2 , which represents less than 10% of its geographical range (Mapelli and Kittlein 2009). The habitat of this species is naturally fragmented, but in recent years the degree of fragmentation has notably increased because of the extraordinary expansion of soybean cultivation in the region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both results are expected given that vegetation cover favors soil development, and enlargement of 334 the root system increases soil compactness, where burrowing becomes energetically more expensive 335 (Mapelli & Kittlein 2009). The fact that we found Ndvi as a factor in the model explaining genetic 336 structure only at the metapopulation level, probably indicates its influence not only on habitat patches 337 but also on their surrounding areas.…”
Section: Niche Stability 256mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Differential responses to fragmentation may be caused by behavioral differences that determine space use and movement patterns of the organisms (Ims 1995). Characteristics such as site fidelity, dispersal ability, colonization capacity, and habitat specialization also influence the vulnerability of species to habitat fragmentation (Ewers and Didham 2006, Mapelli and Kittlein 2009, Dennis et al 2012). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%