2020
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.202000046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Particle Size on the Performance of Polysulfone Magnetic Membranes for O2/N2 Separation

Abstract: Magnetic mixed-matrix membranes (MMMs) are fabricated using polysulfone (PSf) and iron oxide (Fe) for O 2 /N 2 separation. The effects of Fe nanoparticle size and content on the performance of the membranes are investigated using a novel gas permeation unit in the presence of various magnetic fields. The results indicate that the O 2 permeation is improved by adding Fe nanoparticles into the PSf matrix regardless of the particle size. Furthermore, the selectivity of PSf and PSf-Fe membranes is considerably enh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(105 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in fractional free volume resulted in a higher relative gas permeability in the unmagnetized MMM. Raveshiyan, et al [ 36 ] have carried out a study wherein iron oxide filler of 50 nm in diameter resulted in greater O 2 gas permeability relative to a similar filler of 20 nm in diameter in the case of O 2 /N 2 gas separation. Since the cluster size and dispersion were relatively finer and better in the magnetized MMM, there may be enhanced rigidity between the polymer–filler interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in fractional free volume resulted in a higher relative gas permeability in the unmagnetized MMM. Raveshiyan, et al [ 36 ] have carried out a study wherein iron oxide filler of 50 nm in diameter resulted in greater O 2 gas permeability relative to a similar filler of 20 nm in diameter in the case of O 2 /N 2 gas separation. Since the cluster size and dispersion were relatively finer and better in the magnetized MMM, there may be enhanced rigidity between the polymer–filler interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raveshiyan et al [9] observed the highest saturation magnetisation value (23 em•g −1 ) for a polysulfone (PSf) membrane modified with 10 wt% carbonyl iron powder. On the other hand, hard magnets have a high coercivity, which makes it difficult to magnetise and demagnetise them [14,17,18,30,33,34]. For this reason, placing the membranes loaded with hard magnets in an external magnetic field is unnecessary to obtain advantageous separation results.…”
Section: Gas Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies present improvement in membrane morphology or gas separation performances. [6][7][8][9][10][11] However, the aforementioned method only fixates the usage of the magnetic field in a single direction to manipulate filler movement in the MMM. Multiple studies in cancer treatment, hyperthermia, and magnetic microbots, have been utilizing non-static magnetic fields such as rotational or alternating configurations for nano or micro-particle manipulation in various mediums (i.e., blood, water, and solvent).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most studies, the static magnetic field in a single direction was applied after casting the membrane such as the vertical or horizontal direction. These studies present improvement in membrane morphology or gas separation performances 6–11 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%