2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40891-014-0008-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Particle Size on the Friction and Interfacial Shear Strength of Sands of Similar Morphology

Abstract: Size and morphological characteristics of particles play vital role on the shear and interfacial shear strength of sands. Often, effects of these parameters are merged and cannot be easily separated. Effect of size of the particles on the shear and interfacial shear strength of sands is presented in this paper through direct shear and interface direct shear tests complemented with image analyses and surface roughness studies. To eliminate the effect of morphological characteristics, three sands of different pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
31
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
31
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results indicate that the ratio of the band thickness to the mean particle diameter was almost constant, even though the particle size changed. In contrast, Vangla and Latha [52] observed that the band thickness decreased from between 21d 50 and 24d 50 to between 10d 50 and 12d 50 when the mean particle size increased from 0.22 to 0.87 mm. Owing to the particle size dependence of the shear band thickness, with a decreasing B/d 50 , the thickness became relatively larger with respect to the plate thickness.…”
Section: Shear Bandmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results indicate that the ratio of the band thickness to the mean particle diameter was almost constant, even though the particle size changed. In contrast, Vangla and Latha [52] observed that the band thickness decreased from between 21d 50 and 24d 50 to between 10d 50 and 12d 50 when the mean particle size increased from 0.22 to 0.87 mm. Owing to the particle size dependence of the shear band thickness, with a decreasing B/d 50 , the thickness became relatively larger with respect to the plate thickness.…”
Section: Shear Bandmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We could not confirm a local peak corresponding to shear band (II). Various researchers [32,[48][49][50][51][52] have reported that the shear band thickness is strongly affected by the absolute size of the particles. Nemat-Nasser and Okada [50] reported that when the mean particle diameters d 50 were 0.22 and 0.48 mm, the band thicknesses were 11d 50 and 15d 50 , respectively.…”
Section: Shear Bandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No significant difference in the soil friction angle between two types of boxes are found, the variation in friction angle was less than 3.3 %, the angle was slightly lower in the samples prepared in the square box (100 9 100 mm 2 ). It has been found that the friction angle and angle of repose are somewhat correlated [13,24,25]. The average angle of repose for the two types of soil used in this experimental program was estimated in accordance with the procedures given in ASTM C1444 [26].…”
Section: Failure Envelopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palmeira [1] presents test types that characterize, various conditions that can occur in some structures of reinforced soil. Some studies found in the literature, provides laboratory test results with the reinforcement layer positioned parallel to the failure plane induced for the shear box [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. In other research the reinforcing layer is placed perpendicular or rotated to the failure plane [15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason of such a tests lack -very difficult to provide triaxial tests with over consolidated moraine clay. During these experiments it can appear problems with saturation (Kadkhodaie & Rezaee, 2016;Dong, Kong, & Zhe, 2016;Glover, 2017), big particles appearance in shearing plane (Zhang, Baudet, Hu, & Xu, 2017;Vangla & Latha, 2015), long term investigations (Suzuki, Dyvik, & Schmertmann, 2017;Liu, Xie, Shao, & Conil, 2018) and etc. Specimen size effect on the shear strength parameters can affect the design and analysis of many geotechnical constructions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%