2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(01)01239-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of particle in-flight characteristics on the microstructure of atmospheric plasma sprayed yttria stabilized ZrO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

7
60
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
60
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, pores above 10 µm are considered to be globular pores, large inter-columnar spacing and/or larger vertical and horizontal cracks [1]. This assumption is consistent with the approach of Friis [20], which diversified pores into small and large groups (large were those of at least two splat thicknesses). Deshpande [17] evaluates the porosity in the subsequent limits: 3.0-10.0 µm for coarse globular pores, 0.1-3.0 µm for fine pores resulting from incomplete contact between lamellae during coating formation and 0.01-0.5 µm for fine cracks, derived from the relaxation of stresses occurred during splats cooling.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, pores above 10 µm are considered to be globular pores, large inter-columnar spacing and/or larger vertical and horizontal cracks [1]. This assumption is consistent with the approach of Friis [20], which diversified pores into small and large groups (large were those of at least two splat thicknesses). Deshpande [17] evaluates the porosity in the subsequent limits: 3.0-10.0 µm for coarse globular pores, 0.1-3.0 µm for fine pores resulting from incomplete contact between lamellae during coating formation and 0.01-0.5 µm for fine cracks, derived from the relaxation of stresses occurred during splats cooling.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In general, many characterization techniques may be used for porosity analysis. The basic ones are [1,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] The manner of porosity evaluation is classified differently by the literature [1,[17][18][19][20]. Two main approaches can be distinguished: (i) shape-based [1,[16][17][18], and (ii) size-related [1,16,17,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma jets of 8.000-14.000 K and particles speeds in the range 100-300 m/s are generally achieved, allowing a wide range of materials to be melted including highlyrefractory ceramic materials. As a general rule, metallic MCrAlY bondcoats deposited through this technique, always show the presence of oxide strings (2-15%) and porosity (4-10%) [4,5,6], this latter property is also found in ceramic YSZ topcoats (5-25%) along with microcracking [5,7]. Significant advantages in terms hardware simplification could be attained by the application of TBC materials through the Combustion Flame Spray (CFS) technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…r.f. magnetron sputtering, 17 ion beam assisted deposition, 18 e-beam deposition, 19 plasma spraying, 20 pulsed laser deposition 21 and sol-gel 5,22,23 are used. Though the reports on sol-gel derived ZrO 2 thin films show porous nature, the effect of sol-age on the porosity and in turn on the surface and optical properties of films has not been studied in details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%