2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of particle abrasion or hydrofluoric acid etching on lithium disilicate flexural strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
34
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
34
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower bond strength was obtained if the cement was applied without HF etching of the ceramic surface (Table 2), which confirmed the findings reported in earlier studies 1338. The large difference in bond strength contingent on HF etching is explained by the difference in surface texture (Figures 4a and 4c).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lower bond strength was obtained if the cement was applied without HF etching of the ceramic surface (Table 2), which confirmed the findings reported in earlier studies 1338. The large difference in bond strength contingent on HF etching is explained by the difference in surface texture (Figures 4a and 4c).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…To produce micromechanical retention, the surface is prepared by airborne-particle abrasion and/or etching with hydrofluoric acid (HF). However, airborne-particle abrasion is not recommended due to a significant reduction in the flexural strength of IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) 13. HF etching dissolves the glass phase from the matrix, thus creating micro-undercuts and increasing the surface area 14.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been indicated that airborne‐particle abrasion can damage the surfaces and a volume loss can happen in the material . Menees et al concluded that airborne‐particle abrasion caused a decrease in the flexural strength of lithium disilicate ceramic, since microfractures and mechanical stresses occurred at the treated surfaces. The decrease in flexural strength of the etched and airborne‐particle abraded specimens of lithium disilicate ceramic in this study may be explained by the destructive effect of the treatments on the surface of the material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, controversy remains regarding the impact of the etching process on the mechanical properties of lithium disilicate ceramics. Menees et al evaluated the flexural strength of a lithium disilicate ceramic following hydrofluoric acid etching with two concentrations (i.e., 5% and 9.5%), and concluded that the microstructural changes promoted by the hydrofluoric acid did not adversely affect the flexural strength of the ceramic. However, Zogheib et al demonstrated that hydrofluoric acid etching weakened lithium disilicate ceramics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%