2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of operating conditions on the removal of metals and sulfate from copper acid mine drainage by nanofiltration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As observed in Figure 4 and Figure 5, the permeate flux did not vary proportionally with the MWCO of the selected membranes, suggesting that other parameters, including hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity, are crucial factors in membrane performance. Hydrophilic membranes hold water better, thus facilitating flux through pores [45]. The highest fluxes with the clarified extract were achieved with the NF 12A membrane (with MWCO of 500 Da), which presented the lowest contact angle value, whereas the lowest permeate fluxes were observed for GH and GE membranes (with MWCO of 2500 and 1000 Da, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As observed in Figure 4 and Figure 5, the permeate flux did not vary proportionally with the MWCO of the selected membranes, suggesting that other parameters, including hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity, are crucial factors in membrane performance. Hydrophilic membranes hold water better, thus facilitating flux through pores [45]. The highest fluxes with the clarified extract were achieved with the NF 12A membrane (with MWCO of 500 Da), which presented the lowest contact angle value, whereas the lowest permeate fluxes were observed for GH and GE membranes (with MWCO of 2500 and 1000 Da, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 a,c showed that the permeate fluxes of the two membranes were gradually decreased with the increase of the concentration of acrylic acid or acetic acid. The decrease in permeate flux was mainly due to the reduction in effective pressure caused by the increase of osmosis pressure [ 14 , 41 ]. There was no discernable difference in the retentions of acrylic acid and acetic acid in both the two membranes ( Figure 4 b,d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This property of NF membranes is usually used for water treatment and harmful elements removal. Pino et al [ 51 ] stated that the rejection of elements depended on membrane type and operating conditions and Mullett et al [ 52 ] reported that the pH of feed and membrane electrical charge influenced elements and ion retention during nanofiltration of mine water. The pH of the feed influenced the membrane surface charge, permeate flux and retention of individual compounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%