2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of oocyte donor and embryo recipient conditions on cloning efficiency in dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous work, the day of ovulation was considered to be when serum progesterone concentration reached 4.0–9.9 ng/ml and the optimal time for oocyte recovery was planned as 70–76 h after ovulation (Kim et al. ).…”
Section: Canine Oocytementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In previous work, the day of ovulation was considered to be when serum progesterone concentration reached 4.0–9.9 ng/ml and the optimal time for oocyte recovery was planned as 70–76 h after ovulation (Kim et al. ).…”
Section: Canine Oocytementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synchrony (same day ovulation) and advanced synchrony (oocyte donor ovulated 1 day earlier than recipient) showed higher pregnancy and delivery rates than retarded asynchrony (oocyte donor ovulated 1 day later than recipient) (Kim et al. ). The parity of recipient can affect cloning efficiency, with nulliparous recipients associated with higher delivery rate (3.0% vs 1.7%, p < 0.05) than multiparous recipients (Kim et al.…”
Section: Embryo Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recovery of in vivo-matured oocytes, SCNT, and embryo transfer were done on the basis of a previous report [30,35]. In brief, surgical oviduct flushing was performed 72 hours after serum progesterone reached 5 to 10 mg/mL [36], and cumulus cells of matured oocytes were removed by repeated pipetting in 0.1% (wt/vol) hyaluronidase in TCM-199.…”
Section: Production Of a Cloned Dogmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many previous studies attempted to optimize this technique in canids (Jang et al, 2008;Kim et al, 2010;Lee et al, 2005;Oh et al, 2009), SCNT efficiency in dogs remains very low as the underlying mechanisms of reprogramming somatic cells are still unclear . This low efficiency is in line with other species (around 1-5%) (Yang et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%